Skip to content

Make some diagnostics not depend on the source of what they reference being available #105500

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 14, 2022

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Dec 9, 2022

r? @estebank

follow up to #104449

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 9, 2022

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @estebank (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 9, 2022
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

estebank commented Dec 9, 2022

I'm seeing a bunch of test output changes that do not seem related to your code changes. Could there be a missing commit?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Dec 9, 2022

I'm seeing a bunch of test output changes that do not seem related to your code changes. Could there be a missing commit?

I don't believe so

@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the unhide_unknown_spans branch from 408b93c to a412710 Compare December 9, 2022 17:25
@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the unhide_unknown_spans branch from a412710 to ae21671 Compare December 9, 2022 21:04
let snippet = match source_map.span_to_snippet(interior_span) {
// #70935: If snippet contains newlines, display "the value" instead
// so that we do not emit complex diagnostics.
Ok(snippet) if !snippet.contains('\n') => format!("`{}`", snippet),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add a length check here too, just to make sure that the snippet is not for a long expr in one line?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe this entire diagnostic deserves a redesign to point at the span instead of getting the snippet in a message?

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #105554) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the unhide_unknown_spans branch from ae21671 to 18d8fe4 Compare December 12, 2022 15:25
@@ -3,11 +3,9 @@ error[E0412]: cannot find type `n` in this scope
|
LL | type_ascribe!(2, n([u8; || 1]))
| ^ help: a trait with a similar name exists: `Fn`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/ops/function.rs:LL:COL
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is outstanding: it should be ::: or

note: similarly named
  --> $SRC_DIR/...

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 12, 2022

📌 Commit e9dae2129800ad96b1b0ead3a0f485dbd412c06c has been approved by estebank

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 12, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 13, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #105644) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 13, 2022
@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the unhide_unknown_spans branch from e9dae21 to 82ce70a Compare December 13, 2022 10:34
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Dec 13, 2022

@bors r=estebank

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 13, 2022

📌 Commit 82ce70a has been approved by estebank

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 13, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#105147 (Allow unsafe through inline const)
 - rust-lang#105438 (Move some codegen-y methods from `rustc_hir_analysis::collect` -> `rustc_codegen_ssa`)
 - rust-lang#105464 (Support #[track_caller] on async closures)
 - rust-lang#105476 (Change pattern borrowing suggestions to be verbose and remove invalid suggestion)
 - rust-lang#105500 (Make some diagnostics not depend on the source of what they reference being available)
 - rust-lang#105628 (Small doc fixes)
 - rust-lang#105659 (Don't require owned data in `MaybeStorageLive`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 15b9e20 into rust-lang:master Dec 14, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 14, 2022
@oli-obk oli-obk deleted the unhide_unknown_spans branch December 14, 2022 07:04
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants