Skip to content

Rollup of 8 pull requests #106318

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 22 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 8 pull requests #106318

wants to merge 22 commits into from

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Dec 31, 2022

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

pcwalton and others added 22 commits November 17, 2022 09:53
…ecting the

alignment of `byval` on x86 in the process.

Commit 88e4d2c from five years ago removed
support for alignment on indirectly-passed arguments because of problems with
the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target. Unfortunately, the `memcpy` optimizations I
recently added to LLVM 16 depend on this to forward `memcpy`s. This commit
attempts to fix the problems with `byval` parameters on that target and now
correctly adds the `align` attribute.

The problem is summarized in [this comment] by @eddyb. Briefly, 32-bit x86 has
special alignment rules for `byval` parameters: for the most part, their
alignment is forced to 4. This is not well-documented anywhere but in the Clang
source. I looked at the logic in Clang `TargetInfo.cpp` and tried to replicate
it here. The relevant methods in that file are
`X86_32ABIInfo::getIndirectResult()` and
`X86_32ABIInfo::getTypeStackAlignInBytes()`. The `align` parameter attribute
for `byval` parameters in LLVM must match the platform ABI, or miscompilations
will occur. Note that this doesn't use the approach suggested by eddyb, because
I felt it was overkill to store the alignment in `on_stack` when special
handling is really only needed for 32-bit x86.

As a side effect, this should fix rust-lang#80127, because it will make the `align`
parameter attribute for `byval` parameters match the platform ABI on LLVM
x86-64.

[this comment]: rust-lang#80822 (comment)
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Previously, clean only supported `--stage 0` for specific crates.

The new `crate_description` function generates a string that looks
like
```
: {rustc_query_impl}
```
This will prevent users with the pre-push hook from pushing a merge
commit.

Exceptions are added for subtree updates. These exceptions are a little
hacky and may be non-exhaustive but can be extended in the future.
Before:
```
Testing ["rustc_interface"] stage0 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
```

After:
```
Testing {rustc_interface} stage0 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
```

Note there is a slight consistency between `build` and `test`: The
former doesn't print "compiler artifacts". It would be annoying to fix
and doesn't hurt anything, so I left it be.

```
; x t rustc_interface --stage 0 --dry-run
Testing {rustc_interface} stage0 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
; x b rustc_interface --stage 0 --dry-run
Building {rustc_interface} stage0 compiler artifacts (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
```
This makes it easier to see them (and makes people go owo).
rustc_target: Add alignment to indirectly-passed by-value types, correcting the  alignment of `byval` on x86 in the process.

Commit 88e4d2c from five years ago removed
support for alignment on indirectly-passed arguments because of problems with
the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target. Unfortunately, the `memcpy` optimizations I
recently added to LLVM 16 depend on this to forward `memcpy`s. This commit
attempts to fix the problems with `byval` parameters on that target and now
correctly adds the `align` attribute.

The problem is summarized in [this comment] by `@eddyb.` Briefly, 32-bit x86 has
special alignment rules for `byval` parameters: for the most part, their
alignment is forced to 4. This is not well-documented anywhere but in the Clang
source. I looked at the logic in Clang `TargetInfo.cpp` and tried to replicate
it here. The relevant methods in that file are
`X86_32ABIInfo::getIndirectResult()` and
`X86_32ABIInfo::getTypeStackAlignInBytes()`. The `align` parameter attribute
for `byval` parameters in LLVM must match the platform ABI, or miscompilations
will occur. Note that this doesn't use the approach suggested by eddyb, because
I felt it was overkill to store the alignment in `on_stack` when special
handling is really only needed for 32-bit x86.

As a side effect, this should fix rust-lang#80127, because it will make the `align`
parameter attribute for `byval` parameters match the platform ABI on LLVM
x86-64.

[this comment]: rust-lang#80822 (comment)
…-only-bors-is-allowed-to-do-that, r=jyn514

Add tidy check to deny merge commits

This will prevent users with the pre-push hook from pushing a merge commit.

Exceptions are added for subtree updates. These exceptions are a little hacky and may be non-exhaustive but can be extended in the future.

I added a link to `@jyn514's` blog post for the error case because that's the best resource to solve merge commits. But it would probably be better if it was integrated into https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/git.html#no-merge-policy, then we could link that instead.

r? `@jyn514`
Add regression test for rust-lang#86106

Closes rust-lang#86106
r? `@nikic`

Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Make tidy errors red

This makes it easier to see them (and makes people go owo).

I also changes the error codes check to not print too many things and use `tidy_error`.

r? `@jyn514`
…ples-layout-test, r=notriddle

Extend scraped examples layout GUI test for position of buttons

This is a regression test for rust-lang#106279.

r? ``@notriddle``
 bootstrap: Get rid of tail_args in stream_cargo

Based on rust-lang#106303 for convenience.

r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Dont use `--merge-base` during bootstrap formatting subcommand

I use a development image with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, which has git 2.25.

Recently, `./x.py test tidy --bless` regressed in rust-lang#105702 because it uses the `--merge-base` option on `diff-index`, which was only introduced in git 2.30 (git/git@0f5a1d4). Luckily, it can be replicated via two calls to `git merge-base` + `git diff-index`, so let's just use that.
Fix panic on `x build --help`

Fixes rust-lang#106313. This avoids trying to run `get_help` unless we actually need to see the paths that are available for the subcommand.

This originally regressed in rust-lang#106166.
@rustbot rustbot added T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 31, 2022
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Dec 31, 2022

bors looks very confused. not all of these have been approved.

@jyn514 jyn514 closed this Dec 31, 2022
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the rollup-8aavrrl branch December 31, 2022 01:54
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants