Skip to content

Remove duplicated elaborate box derefs pass #106404

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2023

Conversation

tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

@tmiasko tmiasko commented Jan 3, 2023

The pass runs earlier as a part of run_runtime_lowering_passes.

The duplicate was added in #99102.

The pass runs earlier as a part of `run_runtime_lowering_passes`.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 3, 2023

r? @TaKO8Ki

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 3, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 3, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Thanks @tmiasko, good catch!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 3, 2023

📌 Commit 3eabea9 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 3, 2023
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

r? @wesleywiser

@rustbot rustbot assigned wesleywiser and unassigned TaKO8Ki Jan 3, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 5, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 3eabea9 with merge e94fab6...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 5, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: wesleywiser
Pushing e94fab6 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 5, 2023
@bors bors merged commit e94fab6 into rust-lang:master Jan 5, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 5, 2023
@tmiasko tmiasko deleted the dedup-box-derefs branch January 5, 2023 12:50
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e94fab6): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 7
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.7% [-5.5%, -2.5%] 7
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-4.3%, -0.7%] 61
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.7% [-5.5%, -2.5%] 7

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jan 5, 2023
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Single regression is within noise range; improvements are not. Removing perf-regression.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jan 10, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants