Skip to content

Rollup of 9 pull requests #107919

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 11, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #107919

merged 18 commits into from
Feb 11, 2023

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

sdroege and others added 18 commits December 23, 2022 09:34
Some C commandline parsers (e.g. GLib and Qt) are replacing already
handled arguments in `argv` with `NULL` and move them to the end. That
means that `argc` might be bigger than the actual number of non-`NULL`
pointers in `argv` at this point.

To handle this we simply stop iterating at the first `NULL` argument.

`argv` is also guaranteed to be `NULL`-terminated so any non-`NULL`
arguments after the first `NULL` can safely be ignored.

Fixes rust-lang#105999
Makes sure the full header is correctly initialized, including reserve parameters.
…w, r=cjgillot

Add parentheses properly for borrowing suggestion

Fixes rust-lang#104961
… r=ChrisDenton

Stop at the first `NULL` argument when iterating `argv`

Some C commandline parsers (e.g. GLib and Qt) are replacing already handled arguments in `argv` with `NULL` and move them to the end. That means that `argc` might be bigger than the actual number of non-`NULL` pointers in `argv` at this point.

To handle this we simply stop iterating at the first `NULL` argument.

`argv` is also guaranteed to be `NULL`-terminated so any non-`NULL` arguments after the first `NULL` can safely be ignored.

Fixes rust-lang#105999
…ll, r=lcnr

Suggest function call on pattern type mismatch

Fixes rust-lang#101208

This could definitely be generalized to support more suggestions in pattern matches. We can't use all of [`FnCtxt::emit_type_mismatch_suggestions`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir_typeck/fn_ctxt/struct.FnCtxt.html#method.emit_type_mismatch_suggestions), but it's on my to-do list to play around with more suggestions that would be productive in this position.
…tests, r=lcnr

Add a couple random projection tests for new solver

Self-explanatory, they're just some cases that have been on my mind in the past (especially `tests/ui/traits/new-solver/param-candidate-doesnt-shadow-project.rs`).
…tions, r=oli-obk

Add ui test for implementation on projection

The error in full can be seen in rust-lang#107263 and is part of why the PR is blocked (it still requires the approval from the team for supporting it).

r? ``@oli-obk``
…s, r=scottmcm

Clarify `new_size` for realloc means bytes

Minor docs fix requested by rust-lang#107875
Zero the `REPARSE_MOUNTPOINT_DATA_BUFFER` header

Makes sure the full header is correctly initialized.

Fixes rust-lang#107884
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Feb 11, 2023
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

📌 Commit a50c379 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 11, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a50c379 with merge 71f6675...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 71f6675 to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 71f6675 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 11, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 71f6675 into rust-lang:master Feb 11, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha

previous master: 71f6675de1

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 11, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (71f6675): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.3%] 5
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.0% [2.3%, 3.8%] 7
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [0.8%, 4.0%] 46
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.0% [2.3%, 3.8%] 7

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.