Skip to content

BasicBlock::new(0) -> START_BLOCK [no functional changes] #108154

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2023

Conversation

scottmcm
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 17, 2023

r? @lcnr

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 17, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 17, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

compiler-errors commented Feb 17, 2023

Do you want to also change the usages of BasicBlock::from_{u32,usize} similarly?

Also, there's one usage of Location { block: START_BLOCK, statement_index: 0 } and a few of START_BLOCK.start_location() which can be replaced with Location::START, I think?

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

scottmcm commented Feb 17, 2023

Oh, sure, I can do some more of this. 'Twas just only the new(0) that I noticed, so I looked for more of the same 🙃

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 17, 2023
@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the start-block-cleanup branch from 73aa0ec to c946494 Compare February 17, 2023 05:33
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

Didn't find any from_usize(0)s, but hopefully got the rest of them.

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 17, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r=me when green

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=compiler-errors

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 17, 2023

📌 Commit c946494 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 17, 2023
@scottmcm scottmcm assigned compiler-errors and unassigned lcnr Feb 17, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#107592 (Default `repr(C)` enums to `c_int` size)
 - rust-lang#107956 (Copy `bin/*` and `lib/*.dylib` files to `stage0-sysroot`)
 - rust-lang#108126 (fix a line, and do a consistency fix)
 - rust-lang#108144 (Add compiler-errors to a few more triagebot groups)
 - rust-lang#108149 (typo)
 - rust-lang#108154 (`BasicBlock::new(0)` -> `START_BLOCK` [no functional changes])

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ae5473c into rust-lang:master Feb 17, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Feb 17, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants