Rollup of 7 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Properly colorize multi-part suggestions in the same line #108627 (Properly colorize multi-part suggestions in the same line)
• Omit unchanged options from config.toml in configure.py #108632 (Omit unchanged options from config.toml in configure.py)
• Remove unclosed_delims from parser #108715 (Remove unclosed_delims from parser)
• rustdoc: function signature search with traits in where clause #108723 (rustdoc: function signature search with traits in where clause)
• field is not used outside the crate #108724 (field is not used outside the crate)
• rustdoc: Note in a type's layout/size if it is uninhabited #108734 (rustdoc: Note in a type's layout/size if it is uninhabited)
• Remove allow(potential_query_instability) from ast_passes #108736 (Remove allow(potential_query_instability) from ast_passes)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

[bors]

📌 Commit ff95645 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit ff95645 with merge bb18388...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing bb18388 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#108736	d91eae963735c7834a0d7a3c0ae888e122397e41
#108734	9ef47f5a942928a391cf276ee343e421c6d5bec6
#108724	7741e8cea397a4e313cf35ed0cbc061fa4d8dc79
#108723	6d0d133e204b2a0be553f77d347ce43d4b59c5d8
#108715	0e8ee24037ab1b66ed94b859ca5f9a690c89218e
#108632	f09782fdefb269dfaf5beb216aaf94335529d7b3
#108627	d24cc319bddac2747f19fc670d488ce994996502

previous master: f15f0ea739

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (bb18388): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.1%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.7%	[3.7%, 3.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

[Kobzol]

@rust-timer build d91eae963735c7834a0d7a3c0ae888e122397e41

(Just testing a recent change to the perf bot, nothing to see here).

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (d91eae963735c7834a0d7a3c0ae888e122397e41): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	3

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.