Skip to content

rustdoc: Unsupport importing doc(primitive) and doc(keyword) modules #109534

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@petrochenkov petrochenkov commented Mar 23, 2023

These are internal features used for a specific purpose, and modules without imports are enough for that purpose.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 23, 2023

r? @jsha

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 23, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 23, 2023

Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs

cc @camelid

@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 26, 2023
These are internal features used for a specific purpose, and modules without imports are enough for that purpose.
@petrochenkov petrochenkov changed the title rustdoc: Unsupport doc(primitive) and doc(keyword) on imports rustdoc: Unsupport importing doc(primitive) and doc(keyword) modules Mar 28, 2023
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 28, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't we emit a warning to let users know it's not allowed?

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

My goal was to remove code, if the alternative is to report warning then I'd better keep it supported.
As I understand, we are the only users, since it's an internal feature, so the warning is probably not necessary.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Sounds fine indeed.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2023

📌 Commit 52b15b4 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 29, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108335 (rustdoc + rustdoc-json support for `feature(non_lifetime_binders)`)
 - rust-lang#109534 (rustdoc: Unsupport importing `doc(primitive)` and `doc(keyword)` modules)
 - rust-lang#109659 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API change)
 - rust-lang#109664 (Use span of placeholders in format_args!() expansion.)
 - rust-lang#109683 (Check for overflow in `assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty`)
 - rust-lang#109713 (Fix mismatched punctuation in Debug impl of AttrId)
 - rust-lang#109718 (Rename `IndexVec::last` → `last_index`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1db9eae into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 29, 2023
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the noprimuse branch February 22, 2025 18:43
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants