Skip to content

Refactor SyntaxContext::ctxt logic. #110497

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2023
Merged

Refactor SyntaxContext::ctxt logic. #110497

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2023

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

I'm still trying to make a test from the issue.

cc @deepink-mas does this solve the issue?

Fixes #110230

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 18, 2023

r? @b-naber

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 18, 2023
@b-naber
Copy link
Contributor

b-naber commented Apr 22, 2023

The change looks good to me.

I tried to check whether this fixes the example in the issue, but I cannot even reproduce the issue.

@cjgillot Do you want this to be merged now or wait until you come up with a test?

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue is very hard to reproduce, as it relies on the exact number of characters. I think merging without a test is fine: the old code was wrong.

@b-naber
Copy link
Contributor

b-naber commented Apr 22, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 22, 2023

📌 Commit 99962a8 has been approved by b-naber

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 22, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2023
Refactor `SyntaxContext::ctxt` logic.

I'm still trying to make a test from the issue.

cc `@deepink-mas` does this solve the issue?

Fixes rust-lang#110230
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2023
Refactor `SyntaxContext::ctxt` logic.

I'm still trying to make a test from the issue.

cc ``@deepink-mas`` does this solve the issue?

Fixes rust-lang#110230
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2023
Refactor `SyntaxContext::ctxt` logic.

I'm still trying to make a test from the issue.

cc ```@deepink-mas``` does this solve the issue?

Fixes rust-lang#110230
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 23, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 99962a8 with merge f12a7fa...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 23, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: b-naber
Pushing f12a7fa to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 23, 2023
@bors bors merged commit f12a7fa into rust-lang:master Apr 23, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 23, 2023
@cjgillot cjgillot deleted the span-ctxt branch April 23, 2023 11:29
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f12a7fa): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.5%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
11.7% [7.5%, 16.6%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.7% [-1.7%, -1.7%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
5 participants