Update cargo

[weihanglo]

10 commits in 569b648b5831ae8a515e90c80843a5287c3304ef..26b73d15a68fb94579f6d3590585ec0e9d81d3d5
2023-05-05 15:49:44 +0000 to 2023-05-09 20:28:03 +0000

• Update the semver-check script to be able to run in any directory. (Update the semver-check script to be able to run in any directory. cargo#12117)
• Semver: Note that it is not a breaking change to make an unsafe function safe (Semver: Note that it is not a breaking change to make an unsafe function safe cargo#12116)
• Add more documentation for artifact-dependencies. (Add more documentation for artifact-dependencies. cargo#12110)
• changelog: move registry query fixes to the right place (changelog: move registry query fixes to the right place cargo#12086)
• Disallow RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN in the [env] table. (Disallow RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN in the [env] table. cargo#12107)
• Disallow RUSTUP_HOME in the [env] table. (Disallow RUSTUP_HOME in the [env] table. cargo#12101)
• Fix redacting tokens in http debug. (Fix redacting tokens in http debug. cargo#12095)
• Fix self_signed_should_fail for macOS. (Fix self_signed_should_fail for macOS. cargo#12097)
• Update git2 (Update git2 cargo#12096)
• do not try an exponential number of package names (do not try an exponential number of package names cargo#12083)

r? @ghost

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo

cc @ehuss

[weihanglo]

Nothing looks suspicious. Only rust-lang/cargo#12083 may have potential breakage but it has nothing to do with rustc and other components.

@bors r+ p=1

[bors]

📌 Commit 05ffb2f has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 05ffb2f with merge 65dfca8...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing 65dfca8 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (65dfca8): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.0%	[3.0%, 3.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 659.227s -> 657.481s (-0.26%)