Rollup of 2 pull requests #111835
Rollup of 2 pull requests #111835
Conversation
Don't use inner macro in `marker_impls` Just recurse instead of having to define an inner macro to avoid the problem with expansion binders being misnumbered between the `$meta` and `$T` variables. cc `@Veykril` this should fix rust-lang/rust-analyzer#14862 since we've gotten rid of the inner macro.
…e, r=clubby789 Render test messages from bootstrap Bootstrap was not rendering messages from the test harness when a test failed. This can include messages like "test did not panic as expected". This fixes it by making sure those messages are printed on failure. Fixes rust-lang#111825
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=2 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 7ca94f241f In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (2d66e5a): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 643.892s -> 644.433s (0.08%) |
Successful merges:
marker_impls#111810 (Don't use inner macro inmarker_impls)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup