Skip to content

Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results #111980

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 1, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

This means that we now prepopulate MIR with opaques with the right substs.

The first commit is a hack that I think we discussed, having to do with DefiningAnchor::Bubble basically being equivalent to DefiningAnchor::Error in the new solver, so having to use DefiningAnchor::Bind instead, lol.

r? @lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 26, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me after nits

there's still the FIXME that the substs are wrong when calling register_predefined_opaques_in_new_solver, please remove that

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 26, 2023

📌 Commit 3d09b99 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 26, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 26, 2023
@oli-obk oli-obk self-assigned this May 27, 2023
@oli-obk

This comment was marked as resolved.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Addressed outstanding revert comment.

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 31, 2023

📌 Commit df1c1af has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 31, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108459 (rustdoc: Fix LinkReplacer link matching)
 - rust-lang#111318 (Add a distinct `OperandValue::ZeroSized` variant for ZSTs)
 - rust-lang#111892 (rustdoc: add interaction delays for tooltip popovers)
 - rust-lang#111980 (Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results)
 - rust-lang#112024 (Don't suggest break through nested items)
 - rust-lang#112128 (Don't compute inlining status of mono items in advance.)
 - rust-lang#112141 (remove reference to Into in ? operator core/std docs, fix rust-lang#111655)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#112071 (Group rfcs tests)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ccf99bd into rust-lang:master Jun 1, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the unmapped-substs branch August 11, 2023 20:22
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants