Skip to content

Make assumption functions in new solver take Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>> #112665

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

We just use an if-let to match on an optional clause at all the places where we transition from Predicate -> Clause, but I assume that when things like item-bounds and param-env start to only store Clauses then those can just be trivially dropped.

r? @lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Jun 15, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 15, 2023

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Jun 15, 2023

@bors r+ rollup=always

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 15, 2023

📌 Commit b4ba7c4 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 15, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2023
…lause, r=lcnr

Make assumption functions in new solver take `Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>`

We just use an if-let to match on an optional clause at all the places where we transition from `Predicate` -> `Clause`, but I assume that when things like item-bounds and param-env start to only store `Clause`s then those can just be trivially dropped.

r? `@lcnr`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111074 (Relax implicit `T: Sized` bounds on `BufReader<T>`, `BufWriter<T>` and `LineWriter<T>`)
 - rust-lang#112226 (std: available_parallelism using native netbsd api first)
 - rust-lang#112474 (Support 128-bit enum variant in debuginfo codegen)
 - rust-lang#112662 (`#[lang_item]` for `core::ptr::Unique`)
 - rust-lang#112665 (Make assumption functions in new solver take `Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>`)
 - rust-lang#112684 (Disable alignment checks on i686-pc-windows-msvc)
 - rust-lang#112706 (Add `SyntaxContext::is_root`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit cef94ec into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 17, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the assumption-takes-clause branch August 11, 2023 19:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants