Skip to content

Add even more GHA log groups #113514

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jul 15, 2023
Merged

Add even more GHA log groups #113514

merged 13 commits into from
Jul 15, 2023

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Jul 9, 2023

This also adds a dynamic check that we don't emit nested groups, since GHA currently doesn't support them.

r? @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 9, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the more-gha-groups branch from 2c8b083 to 7064af0 Compare July 10, 2023 04:08
Comment on lines +52 to +57
// https://github.com/actions/toolkit/issues/1001
assert!(
!GROUP_ACTIVE.swap(true, Ordering::Relaxed),
"nested groups are not supported by GHA!"
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I should probably do this in ui_test, too

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 10, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

wow, logs look so accessible now

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 10, 2023

📌 Commit 7064af0 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 10, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2023
Add even more GHA log groups

This also adds a dynamic check that we don't emit nested groups, since GHA currently doesn't support them.

r? `@oli-obk`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2023
Add even more GHA log groups

This also adds a dynamic check that we don't emit nested groups, since GHA currently doesn't support them.

r? ``@oli-obk``
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors r-
#113554 (comment)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 10, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 12, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #113214) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the more-gha-groups branch from 7064af0 to db2853f Compare July 13, 2023 05:41
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jul 13, 2023

@bors r=oli-obk rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 13, 2023

📌 Commit db2853fe97f9897a3374d0f367eed48db0520619 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 13, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 14, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #113676) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 14, 2023
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 14, 2023

📌 Commit 3a0caed has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 14, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 3a0caed with merge 4888db91469c3e293a7ad1ba5ceae2649821da6c...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 4888db91469c3e293a7ad1ba5ceae2649821da6c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 15, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2023

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Update is not a fast forward

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4888db91469c3e293a7ad1ba5ceae2649821da6c): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.0% [0.8%, 3.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.6% [-3.7%, -1.6%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.3% [1.6%, 4.9%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.3% [1.6%, 4.9%] 2

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 657.64s -> 659.449s (0.28%)

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jul 15, 2023

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jul 15, 2023

@bors retry #113713

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 3a0caed with merge 4d6e426...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 15, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 4d6e426 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 4d6e426 into rust-lang:master Jul 15, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Jul 15, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4d6e426): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.9% [2.7%, 3.0%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-3.6%, -1.7%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 657.64s -> 657.725s (0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jul 15, 2023
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the more-gha-groups branch July 15, 2023 17:13
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Jul 15, 2023

this doesn't affect how the compiler was built at all, the perf regression must be spurious.

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

this doesn't affect how the compiler was built at all, the perf regression must be spurious.

I agree. Marking as triaged.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants