add dropck_outlives comments

[lcnr]

No description provided.

[rustbot]

r? @eholk

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[lcnr]

infcx.at(...).dropck_outlives(...) has been removed after we finalized the switch to NLL as dropck_outlives is now exclusively used during mir borrowck

[compiler-errors]

(r=me either clarifying the "not" bc I'm confused by the wording of that sentence, or fixing it)

r? @compiler-errors

[lcnr]

the comment was just plainly wrong 😅 forgot the meaning of boring_locals, rewrote that section.

[compiler-errors]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit fc98c5a has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit fc98c5a with merge 90bb418...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 90bb418 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (90bb418): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.1%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data