Skip to content

Issue numbers are enforced on active features; remove FIXME #114556

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023

Conversation

Enselic
Copy link
Member

@Enselic Enselic commented Aug 6, 2023

Since #51090 tidy enforces that active features have an issue number, so remove the FIXME.

This PR is part of #44366 which is E-help-wanted.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 6, 2023

r? @jackh726

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 6, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? @compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 6, 2023

📌 Commit 2b9876b has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 6, 2023
@@ -108,8 +108,6 @@ impl UnstableFeatures {

fn find_lang_feature_issue(feature: Symbol) -> Option<NonZeroU32> {
if let Some(info) = ACTIVE_FEATURES.iter().find(|t| t.name == feature) {
// FIXME (#28244): enforce that active features have issue numbers
// assert!(info.issue.is_some())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we keep the assert uncommented?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried but that ICEd because it hit so called "internal" features that does not have tracking issues (and those features are special cased by the tidy check )

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#114535 (bump schannel, miow to drop windows-sys 0.42)
 - rust-lang#114542 (interpret: use ConstPropNonsense for more const-prop induced issues)
 - rust-lang#114543 (add tests for some fixed ConstProp ICEs)
 - rust-lang#114550 (Generate better function argument names in global_allocator expansion)
 - rust-lang#114556 (Issue numbers are enforced on active features; remove FIXME)
 - rust-lang#114558 (Remove FIXME about NLL diagnostic that is already improved)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#114485 (Add trait decls to SMIR)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 44479d1 into rust-lang:master Aug 7, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 7, 2023
@Enselic Enselic deleted the issue-numbers-enforced branch August 7, 2023 06:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants