Skip to content

Inline functions called from add_coverage #115058

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

Swatinem
Copy link
Contributor

This removes quite a bit of indirection and duplicated code related to getting the FunctionCoverage.

CC @Zalathar

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 21, 2023

r? @fee1-dead

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 21, 2023
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot label +A-code-coverage

@rustbot rustbot added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label Aug 22, 2023
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, these methods were left over from the SSA/LLVM split that was removed in #113355, so getting rid of them makes sense.

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

I'm not familiar with codegen code.

r? compiler

@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned fee1-dead Aug 22, 2023
This removes quite a bit of indirection and duplicated code related to getting the `FunctionCoverage`.
@Swatinem Swatinem force-pushed the inline-add-coverage branch from 39cba67 to 2ceea9a Compare August 22, 2023 08:59
Copy link
Contributor

@Zalathar Zalathar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. 👍

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 30, 2023

📌 Commit 2ceea9a has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 30, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 30, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 2ceea9a with merge 8c79e8d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 30, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 8c79e8d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 30, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 8c79e8d into rust-lang:master Aug 30, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Aug 30, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (8c79e8d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.9% [0.6%, 1.3%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.2% [-1.3%, -1.1%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-3.1%, -1.4%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.1% [-1.3%, 1.3%] 4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.6% [-0.7%, -0.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.6% [-0.7%, -0.4%] 2

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 632.335s -> 630.996s (-0.21%)
Artifact size: 316.60 MiB -> 316.52 MiB (-0.03%)

@Swatinem Swatinem deleted the inline-add-coverage branch January 6, 2024 07:57
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants