Skip to content

rustdoc: add impl items from aliased type into sidebar #115682

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 10, 2023

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@notriddle notriddle commented Sep 8, 2023

Follow-up of #115201.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 8, 2023
}));
}
let mut saw_impls = FxHashSet::default();
v.retain(|i| saw_impls.insert(i.def_id()));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just thought about it but wouldn't it be better to use saw_impls directly in v.extend(av.iter().filter(|impl_| { ... }? Like that no need to re-run a loop here to remove duplicated items. That should also limit the perf regression.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

I suppose it'll impact performance so let's avoid rollup.

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 10, 2023

📌 Commit c79b960 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 10, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 10, 2023

⌛ Testing commit c79b960 with merge 9be37f127178eafda298d57a2c0d788cc9a15c78...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job armhf-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 10, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 10, 2023
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Network error in a non-rustdoc test.

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 10, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 10, 2023

⌛ Testing commit c79b960 with merge 030e4d3...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 10, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 030e4d3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 10, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 030e4d3 into rust-lang:master Sep 10, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 10, 2023
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/impl-sidebar branch September 10, 2023 23:56
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (030e4d3): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-2.9%, -2.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 630.509s -> 629.082s (-0.23%)
Artifact size: 317.56 MiB -> 317.60 MiB (0.01%)

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
… r=notriddle

rustdoc: Add missing "Aliased type" title in the sidebar

Follow-up of rust-lang#115682.

The sections title are supposed to be present in the sidebar, we forgot to put this one so I added it into it. I also added the missing newly created `aliased-type` ID into the `DEFAULT_ID_MAP`.

r? `@notriddle`
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#115752 - GuillaumeGomez:aliased-type-title, r=notriddle

rustdoc: Add missing "Aliased type" title in the sidebar

Follow-up of rust-lang#115682.

The sections title are supposed to be present in the sidebar, we forgot to put this one so I added it into it. I also added the missing newly created `aliased-type` ID into the `DEFAULT_ID_MAP`.

r? `@notriddle`
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants