Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #116636

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 15 commits October 4, 2023 04:22
…th-variance, r=lcnr

Relate alias ty with variance

In the new solver, turns out that the subst-relate branch of the alias-relate predicate was relating args invariantly even for opaques, which have variance 💀.

This change is a bit more invasive, but I'd rather not special-case it [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/aeaa5c30e5c9041264a2e8314b68ad84c2dc3169/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/alias_relate.rs#L171-L190) and then have it break elsewhere. I'm doing a perf run to see if the extra call to `def_kind` is that expensive, if it is, I'll reconsider.

r? `@lcnr`
…lize-for-closure, r=lcnr

Structurally normalize for closure

Fixes some signature deduction problems in the new trait solver (and in the case of async, an ICE).

r? lcnr
use `PatKind::wild` when an ADT const value has violation

Fixes rust-lang#115599

Since the [to_pat](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111913/files#diff-6d8d99538aca600d633270051580c7a9e40b35824ea2863d9dda2c85a733b5d9R126-R155) behavior has been changed in the rust-lang#111913 update, the kind of `inlined_const_ast_pat` has transformed from `PatKind::Leaf { pattern: Pat { kind: Wild, ..} } ` to `PatKind::Constant`. This caused a scenario where there are no matched candidates, leading to a testing of the candidates. This process ultimately attempts to test the string const, triggering the `bug!` invocation finally.

r? `@oli-obk`
…l, r=notriddle

Prevent showing methods from blanket impls of not available foreign traits to show up in the search results

Fixes rust-lang#115480.

In the case that the blanket impl trait is not available in the current crate, we prevent adding its methods in the search index.

Now how I found how to fix the issue: the `equivalent` method is not generated in the documentation pages but was still added to the search index. To render impls, we iterate over `cache.impls` so I took a look at how this was generated. Inside `formats/cache.rs`, we have `CacheBuilder::populate` where we push impls into `impls` but with this condition:

```rust
if cx.cache.traits.contains_key(&trait_did) {
```

I re-used this condition in `CacheBuilder::fold_item` to prevent this method from being added in `cache.search_index` or `cache.orphan_impl_items`.

PS: If you want to double-check if the added test works, just comment the code I added in `cache.rs` and it should fail.

r? `@notriddle`
…orino

small cleanup

this is exactly the same as the `lower_param_bounds` function, so use that instead
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 11, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2023

📌 Commit 98a2de4 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #115937) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 11, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

lol

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-5rdjosn branch March 16, 2024 18:18
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants