Skip to content

Subtree update of rust-analyzer #117701

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 245 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023
Merged

Subtree update of rust-analyzer #117701

merged 245 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented Nov 8, 2023

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2023
Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`

r? `@HKalbasi`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 88062bf (88062bf31620eb17643d7d270a3a8c75803750d6)

@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member

onur-ozkan commented Nov 14, 2023

You have to set DIST_TRY_BUILD to 0 in order to build rust-analyzer in try builds. Otherwise it will be skipped like in the build above.

@HKalbasi
Copy link
Member

Doesn't work on my machine

Running cargo +nightly build --features in-rust-tree in the src/tools/rust-analyzer works on my machine on the current branch. What error do you get?

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Nov 14, 2023

What error do you get?

It's probably unrelated, something about a missing LLVM library.

Do I set DIST_TRY_BUILD=0 in src/ci/github-actions/ci.yml? I'm inclined to r+ it directly.

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Nov 14, 2023

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 6ad73f5 with merge f3770ce...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2023
Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`

r? `@HKalbasi`
@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Nov 14, 2023

@bors cancel

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Nov 14, 2023

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 14, 2023
@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Nov 14, 2023

@bors r=onur-ozkan,HKalbasi

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

📌 Commit 6ad73f5 has been approved by onur-ozkan,HKalbasi

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 14, 2023
@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Nov 14, 2023

@bors try-

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 6ad73f5 with merge 49b27f4...

@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member

Do I set DIST_TRY_BUILD=0 in src/ci/github-actions/ci.yml? I'm inclined to r+ it directly.

You triggered the try build, but try build doesn't check tools with DIST_TRY_BUILD=1 which is defined in the actions file.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 14, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: onur-ozkan,HKalbasi
Pushing 49b27f4 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 14, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 49b27f4 into rust-lang:master Nov 14, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 14, 2023
@lnicola lnicola deleted the sync-from-ra branch November 14, 2023 20:40
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (49b27f4): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Warning ⚠: The following benchmark(s) failed to build:

  • cargo-0.60.0

cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.2% [3.1%, 3.3%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.2% [3.1%, 3.3%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-2.7%, -2.0%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.6% [2.1%, 3.2%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.1% [-1.2%, -1.1%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.8% [-1.2%, 3.2%] 4

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 676.64s -> 673.687s (-0.44%)
Artifact size: 311.08 MiB -> 311.12 MiB (0.01%)

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Dropping regression label, appears to be noise in the Cargo benchmark (immediately recovered on next commit).

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.