Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Make regionck care about placeholders in outlives components #118000

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Currently, we don't consider a placeholder type !T to be a type component when it comes to processing type-outlives obligations. This means that they are essentially treated like unit values with no sub-components, and always outlive any region. This is problematic for non_lifetime_binders, and even more problematic for with_negative_coherence, since negative coherence uses placeholders as universals.

This PR adds Component::Placeholder which acts much like Component::Param. This currently causes a regression in some non-lifetime-binders tests because for<T> T: 'static doesn't imply itself when processing outlives obligations, so code like this will fail:

fn foo() where for<T> T: 'static {
  foo() //~ fails
}

Since the where clause doesn't imply itself. This requires making the MatchAgainstHigherRankedOutlives relation smarter when it comes to binders.

r? types

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 17, 2023
@@ -7,5 +7,20 @@ LL | #![feature(non_lifetime_binders)]
= note: see issue #108185 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108185> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default

warning: 1 warning emitted
error[E0309]: the placeholder type `!1_"F"` may not live long enough
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really care about fixing this diagnostic regression for now, since it's behind a super unstable feature gate.

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
#![feature(negative_impls)]
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This currently fails on nightly for the same root cause as #117994. Only after that PR is this behavior exploitable. I'm just committing this test here, though, since it should not regress.

Copy link
Member

@aliemjay aliemjay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense. You can r=me after the nits.
r? aliemjay

@rustbot rustbot assigned aliemjay and unassigned spastorino Nov 19, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=aliemjay

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 19, 2023

📌 Commit 8f267e2 has been approved by aliemjay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 19, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117828 (Avoid iterating over hashmaps in astconv)
 - rust-lang#117832 (interpret: simplify handling of shifts by no longer trying to handle signed and unsigned shift amounts in the same branch)
 - rust-lang#117891 (Recover `dyn` and `impl` after `for<...>`)
 - rust-lang#117957 (if available use a Child's pidfd for kill/wait)
 - rust-lang#117988 (Handle attempts to have multiple `cfg`d tail expressions)
 - rust-lang#117994 (Ignore but do not assume region obligations from unifying headers in negative coherence)
 - rust-lang#118000 (Make regionck care about placeholders in outlives components)
 - rust-lang#118068 (subtree update cg_gcc 2023/11/17)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
…tthiaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117828 (Avoid iterating over hashmaps in astconv)
 - rust-lang#117832 (interpret: simplify handling of shifts by no longer trying to handle signed and unsigned shift amounts in the same branch)
 - rust-lang#117891 (Recover `dyn` and `impl` after `for<...>`)
 - rust-lang#117957 (if available use a Child's pidfd for kill/wait)
 - rust-lang#117988 (Handle attempts to have multiple `cfg`d tail expressions)
 - rust-lang#117994 (Ignore but do not assume region obligations from unifying headers in negative coherence)
 - rust-lang#118000 (Make regionck care about placeholders in outlives components)
 - rust-lang#118068 (subtree update cg_gcc 2023/11/17)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6388c0e into rust-lang:master Nov 20, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 20, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118000 - compiler-errors:placeholder-ty-outlives, r=aliemjay

Make regionck care about placeholders in outlives components

Currently, we don't consider a placeholder type `!T` to be a type component when it comes to processing type-outlives obligations. This means that they are essentially treated like unit values with no sub-components, and always outlive any region. This is problematic for `non_lifetime_binders`, and even more problematic for `with_negative_coherence`, since negative coherence uses placeholders as universals.

This PR adds `Component::Placeholder` which acts much like `Component::Param`. This currently causes a regression in some non-lifetime-binders tests because `for<T> T: 'static` doesn't imply itself when processing outlives obligations, so code like this will fail:

```
fn foo() where for<T> T: 'static {
  foo() //~ fails
}
```

Since the where clause doesn't imply itself. This requires making the `MatchAgainstHigherRankedOutlives` relation smarter when it comes to binders.

r? types
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants