Skip to content

Improve some comments for non-zero ops #118313

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

This makes them a bit more explicit/correct.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 26, 2023

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 26, 2023
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member Author

@bors rollup

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Nov 27, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 27, 2023

📌 Commit c860ba1 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 27, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 27, 2023

⌛ Testing commit c860ba1 with merge 601a427...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 27, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: thomcc
Pushing 601a427 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 27, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 601a427 into rust-lang:master Nov 27, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 27, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (601a427): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.6% [-3.6%, -3.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 674.035s -> 674.674s (0.09%)
Artifact size: 313.34 MiB -> 313.34 MiB (0.00%)

@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the fixup_comments_in_some_nonzero_ops branch November 27, 2023 18:00
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Fix comments for unsigned non-zero `checked_add`, `saturating_add`

While looking at rust-lang#118313, I happened to notice that two of the expanded comments appear to be slightly inaccurate.

For these two methods, `other` is an ordinary unsigned integer, so it can be zero.

Since the sum of non-zero and zero is always non-zero, the safety argument holds even when `other` is zero.
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118397 - Zalathar:nonzero, r=WaffleLapkin

Fix comments for unsigned non-zero `checked_add`, `saturating_add`

While looking at rust-lang#118313, I happened to notice that two of the expanded comments appear to be slightly inaccurate.

For these two methods, `other` is an ordinary unsigned integer, so it can be zero.

Since the sum of non-zero and zero is always non-zero, the safety argument holds even when `other` is zero.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants