Skip to content

Fix arm64e-apple-ios target #119118

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023
Merged

Conversation

arttet
Copy link
Contributor

@arttet arttet commented Dec 19, 2023

Now we have warnings such as

'+paca' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
'+pacg' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)

Because we should use LLVM features.

We need to use LLVM features here. Otherwise we get warnings such as
'+paca' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 19, 2023

r? @petrochenkov

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 19, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 19, 2023

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 19, 2023

📌 Commit fd0033c has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 19, 2023
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
… r=petrochenkov

Fix arm64e-apple-ios target

- [x] [Remove legacy `bitcode` defaults](rust-lang#117364)
- [x] Use LLVM features

Now we have warnings such as

```
'+paca' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
'+pacg' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
```

Because we should use LLVM features.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118691 (Add check for possible CStr literals in pre-2021)
 - rust-lang#118973 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Don't drop `IncorrectCguReuseType` , make `rustc_expected_cgu_reuse` attr work)
 - rust-lang#119071 (-Znext-solver: adapt overflow rules to avoid breakage)
 - rust-lang#119089 (effects: fix a comment)
 - rust-lang#119096 (Yeet unnecessary param envs)
 - rust-lang#119118 (Fix arm64e-apple-ios target)
 - rust-lang#119134 (resolve: Feed visibilities for unresolved trait impl items)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#118691 (Add check for possible CStr literals in pre-2021)
 - rust-lang#118973 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Don't drop `IncorrectCguReuseType` , make `rustc_expected_cgu_reuse` attr work)
 - rust-lang#119071 (-Znext-solver: adapt overflow rules to avoid breakage)
 - rust-lang#119089 (effects: fix a comment)
 - rust-lang#119096 (Yeet unnecessary param envs)
 - rust-lang#119118 (Fix arm64e-apple-ios target)
 - rust-lang#119134 (resolve: Feed visibilities for unresolved trait impl items)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 20, 2023

⌛ Testing commit fd0033c with merge 3095d31...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 20, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 3095d31 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 20, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 3095d31 into rust-lang:master Dec 20, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 20, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3095d31): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.9% [-1.0%, -0.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-3.4%, -3.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.1% [-1.0%, 1.4%] 3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 670.994s -> 672.674s (0.25%)
Artifact size: 312.83 MiB -> 312.84 MiB (0.00%)

@arttet arttet deleted the feature/fix-arm64e-targets branch February 26, 2024 12:20
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants