Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

rc,sync: Do not create references to uninitialized values #119433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

taiki-e
Copy link
Member

@taiki-e taiki-e commented Dec 30, 2023

Closes #119241

r? @RalfJung

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 30, 2023
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Sorry, I can't review libs changes.
r? libs

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

Even if it's decided to not be UB, I think this still makes the code nicer. Thanks!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2024

📌 Commit 4e973b0 has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 21, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
rc,sync: Do not create references to uninitialized values

Closes rust-lang#119241

r? `@RalfJung`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119433 (rc,sync: Do not create references to uninitialized values)
 - rust-lang#119460 (coverage: Never emit improperly-ordered coverage regions)
 - rust-lang#119766 (Split tait and impl trait in assoc items logic)
 - rust-lang#120160 (Manually implement derived `NonZero` traits.)
 - rust-lang#120177 (Remove duplicate dependencies for rustc)
 - rust-lang#120183 (Add `#[coverage(off)]` to closures introduced by `#[test]` and `#[bench]`)
 - rust-lang#120185 (coverage: Don't instrument `#[automatically_derived]` functions)
 - rust-lang#120201 (Bump some deps with syn 1.0 dependencies)
 - rust-lang#120246 (Re-add estebank to review rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 4e973b0 with merge dfe53af...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nilstrieb
Pushing dfe53af to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 23, 2024
@bors bors merged commit dfe53af into rust-lang:master Jan 23, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 23, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (dfe53af): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-5.5% [-5.5%, -5.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.1% [-3.1%, -3.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -5.5% [-5.5%, -5.5%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Bootstrap: 662.447s -> 662.823s (0.06%)
Artifact size: 308.28 MiB -> 308.32 MiB (0.01%)

@taiki-e taiki-e deleted the rc-uninit-ref branch January 26, 2024 15:19
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Arc/Rc is creating references to uninitialized values
8 participants