core: add Duration constructors #120307
Merged
core: add Duration constructors #120307
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
3 tasks
|
I think most of these make sense, modulo any potential bikeshedding on names. r? libs |
|
@bors r+ rollup Going to go ahead and treat the above as an ACP-equivalent approval. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117740 (Add some links and minor explanatory comments to `std::fmt`) - rust-lang#118307 (Remove an unneeded helper from the tuple library code) - rust-lang#119242 (Suggest less bug-prone construction of Duration in docs) - rust-lang#119449 (Fix `clippy::correctness` in the library) - rust-lang#120307 (core: add Duration constructors) - rust-lang#120459 (Document various I/O descriptor/handle conversions) - rust-lang#120729 (Update mdbook to 0.4.37) - rust-lang#120763 (Suggest pattern tests when modifying exhaustiveness) - rust-lang#120906 (Remove myself from some review rotations) - rust-lang#120916 (Subtree update of ` rust-analyzer`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117740 (Add some links and minor explanatory comments to `std::fmt`) - rust-lang#118307 (Remove an unneeded helper from the tuple library code) - rust-lang#119242 (Suggest less bug-prone construction of Duration in docs) - rust-lang#119449 (Fix `clippy::correctness` in the library) - rust-lang#120307 (core: add Duration constructors) - rust-lang#120459 (Document various I/O descriptor/handle conversions) - rust-lang#120729 (Update mdbook to 0.4.37) - rust-lang#120763 (Suggest pattern tests when modifying exhaustiveness) - rust-lang#120906 (Remove myself from some review rotations) - rust-lang#120916 (Subtree update of ` rust-analyzer`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120307 - djc:duration-constructors, r=Mark-Simulacrum core: add Duration constructors Add more `Duration` constructors. Tracking issue: rust-lang#120301. These match similar convenience constructors available on both `chrono::Duration` and `time::Duration`. What's the best ordering for these with respect to the existing constructors?
3 tasks
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add more
Durationconstructors.Tracking issue: #120301.
These match similar convenience constructors available on both
chrono::Durationandtime::Duration.What's the best ordering for these with respect to the existing constructors?