Skip to content

Document &CStr to CString conversion #120458

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rytheo
Copy link
Contributor

@rytheo rytheo commented Jan 28, 2024

Related to #51430

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 28, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 28, 2024
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 4, 2024

📌 Commit 6aec11a has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 4, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2024
…-Simulacrum

Document `&CStr` to `CString` conversion

Related to rust-lang#51430
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2024
…-Simulacrum

Document `&CStr` to `CString` conversion

Related to rust-lang#51430
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119481 (Clarify ambiguity in select_nth_unstable docs)
 - rust-lang#120384 (Use `<T, U>` for array/slice equality `impl`s)
 - rust-lang#120423 (update indirect structural match lints to match RFC and to show up for dependencies)
 - rust-lang#120458 (Document `&CStr` to `CString` conversion)
 - rust-lang#120558 (Stop bailing out from compilation just because there were incoherent traits)
 - rust-lang#120572 (Update libc to 0.2.153)
 - rust-lang#120641 (rustdoc: trait.impl, type.impl: sort impls to make it not depend on serialization order)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#119481 (Clarify ambiguity in select_nth_unstable docs)
 - rust-lang#119600 (Remove outdated references to librustc_middle)
 - rust-lang#120458 (Document `&CStr` to `CString` conversion)
 - rust-lang#120569 (coverage: Improve handling of function/closure spans)
 - rust-lang#120572 (Update libc to 0.2.153)
 - rust-lang#120587 (miri: normalize struct tail in ABI compat check)
 - rust-lang#120607 (fix rust-lang#120603 by adding a check in default_read_buf)
 - rust-lang#120636 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)
 - rust-lang#120641 (rustdoc: trait.impl, type.impl: sort impls to make it not depend on serialization order)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9838e94 into rust-lang:master Feb 5, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 5, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120458 - rytheo:cstr-conversion-doc, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Document `&CStr` to `CString` conversion

Related to rust-lang#51430
@rytheo rytheo deleted the cstr-conversion-doc branch February 6, 2024 23:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants