Skip to content

check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds #121522

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 24, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Fixes #77477
r? @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 23, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 23, 2024

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

@RalfJung RalfJung force-pushed the insert-extract-boundscheck branch from e2ad39f to f714984 Compare February 23, 2024 18:36
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@RalfJung RalfJung force-pushed the insert-extract-boundscheck branch from f714984 to 134e2b2 Compare February 23, 2024 18:44
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 23, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 23, 2024

📌 Commit 134e2b2 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 23, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 23, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 134e2b2 with merge 627d20d...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
… r=oli-obk

check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds

Fixes rust-lang#77477
r? `@oli-obk`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 23, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 23, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
2
Image input checksum 1c43300698300c5cf94386814ed77f2940acce09689b051da2abc327d16e65b7efbef34ace3339880f0ba3871b962b49895e9356fb7734ce6e4cb052eef354ce
##[group]Building docker image for armhf-gnu
Docker version 24.0.8, build e0dfb46
Error response from daemon: Get "https://ghcr.io/v2/": Get "https://ghcr.io/token?account=rust-lang-ci&client_id=docker&offline_token=true&service=ghcr.io": net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers) (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry Error response from daemon: Get "https://ghcr.io/v2/": Get "https://ghcr.io/token?account=rust-lang-ci&client_id=docker&offline_token=true&service=ghcr.io": net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers) (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 24, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#121435 (Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion)
 - rust-lang#121490 (Rustdoc: include crate name in links for local primitives)
 - rust-lang#121520 (delay cloning of iterator items)
 - rust-lang#121522 (check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds)
 - rust-lang#121531 (Ignore less tests in debug builds)
 - rust-lang#121539 (compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/tests.rs: Avoid unnecessary large move)
 - rust-lang#121542 (update stdarch)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b87a713 into rust-lang:master Feb 24, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 24, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121522 - RalfJung:insert-extract-boundscheck, r=oli-obk

check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds

Fixes rust-lang#77477
r? `@oli-obk`
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the insert-extract-boundscheck branch February 25, 2024 07:14
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

simd_insert and simd_extract allow garbage data
5 participants