Skip to content

Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead #121899

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

shepmaster
Copy link
Member

Related to #119645

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 2, 2024

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 2, 2024
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 13, 2024

📌 Commit 71080dd has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 13, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…ywiser

Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead

Related to rust-lang#119645
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104353 (Add CStr::bytes iterator)
 - rust-lang#114038 (unix time module now return result)
 - rust-lang#119676 (rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions)
 - rust-lang#120699 (Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls.)
 - rust-lang#121899 (Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead)
 - rust-lang#121940 (Mention Register Size in `#[warn(asm_sub_register)]`)
 - rust-lang#122397 (Various cleanups around the const eval query providers)
 - rust-lang#122405 (Add methods to create StableMIR constant)
 - rust-lang#122416 (Various style improvements to `rustc_lint::levels`)
 - rust-lang#122440 (const-eval: organize and extend tests for required-consts)
 - rust-lang#122461 (fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…ywiser

Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead

Related to rust-lang#119645
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…ywiser

Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead

Related to rust-lang#119645
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104353 (Add CStr::bytes iterator)
 - rust-lang#119676 (rustdoc-search: search types by higher-order functions)
 - rust-lang#120699 (Document `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` calls.)
 - rust-lang#121899 (Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead)
 - rust-lang#122405 (Add methods to create StableMIR constant)
 - rust-lang#122416 (Various style improvements to `rustc_lint::levels`)
 - rust-lang#122421 (Improve `Step` docs)
 - rust-lang#122440 (const-eval: organize and extend tests for required-consts)
 - rust-lang#122461 (fix unsoundness in Step::forward_unchecked for signed integers)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#122397 (Various cleanups around the const eval query providers)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7a744af into rust-lang:master Mar 14, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Mar 14, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121899 - shepmaster:dead-code-docs, r=wesleywiser

Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead

Related to rust-lang#119645
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants