Skip to content

Fix stack overflow with recursive associated types #122366

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Mar 12, 2024

fixes #122364

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 12, 2024

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 12, 2024
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Mar 12, 2024

r? @lcnr

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 12, 2024

📌 Commit 783490d has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned lcnr and unassigned wesleywiser Mar 12, 2024
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 12, 2024
@@ -240,6 +240,10 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeVisitor<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for OpaqueTypeCollector<'tcx> {
continue;
}

if !self.seen.insert(assoc.def_id.expect_local()) {
return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one thought: if we first encounter <Self as Trait>::Gat<u32> which normalizes to <u32 as Trait>::Atpit and then later encounter <Self as Trait>::Gat<Self>, which normalizes to <Self as Trait>::Atpit, this change causes us to not define Atpit anymore, does it?

While it seems fine to not support that for now, I would like to have an open issue/test for that

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oof right, we had this issue with structs before -.- I knew why I didn't want this check. Maybe I should move the recursion check even later

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#121754 ([bootstrap] Move the `split-debuginfo` setting to the per-target section)
 - rust-lang#121953 (Add tests for the generated assembly of mask related simd instructions.)
 - rust-lang#122081 (validate `builder::PATH_REMAP`)
 - rust-lang#122245 (Detect truncated DepGraph files)
 - rust-lang#122354 (bootstrap: Don't eagerly format verbose messages)
 - rust-lang#122355 (rustdoc: fix up old test)
 - rust-lang#122363 (tests: Add ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-str-list.rs)
 - rust-lang#122366 (Fix stack overflow with recursive associated types)
 - rust-lang#122377 (Fix discriminant_kind copy paste from the pointee trait case)
 - rust-lang#122378 (Properly rebuild rustbooks)
 - rust-lang#122380 (Fix typo in lib.rs of proc_macro)
 - rust-lang#122381 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0b31375 into rust-lang:master Mar 12, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Mar 12, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122366 - oli-obk:opaques_defined_by_overflow, r=lcnr

Fix stack overflow with recursive associated types

fixes rust-lang#122364
@oli-obk oli-obk deleted the opaques_defined_by_overflow branch June 12, 2024 15:24
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

stack overflow
5 participants