Skip to content

match lowering: build the Place instead of keeping a PlaceBuilder around #122439

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

Outside of MatchPair::new we don't construct new places, so we don't need to keep a PlaceBuilder around.

A bit annoyingly we have to store an Option<Place> even though it's never None after simplification, but the alternative would be to re-entangle MatchPair construction and simplification and I'd rather not do that.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 13, 2024

r? @TaKO8Ki

rustbot has assigned @TaKO8Ki.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 13, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? compiler-errors will review later lol

@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned TaKO8Ki Mar 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

(maybe after a rebase idk it's been 2 weeks)

@compiler-errors compiler-errors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 26, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 26, 2024

📌 Commit 14f186c has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 26, 2024
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
…piler-errors

match lowering: build the `Place` instead of keeping a `PlaceBuilder` around

Outside of `MatchPair::new` we don't construct new places, so we don't need to keep a `PlaceBuilder` around.

A bit annoyingly we have to store an `Option<Place>` even though it's never `None` after simplification, but the alternative would be to re-entangle `MatchPair` construction and simplification and I'd rather not do that.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122439 (match lowering: build the `Place` instead of keeping a `PlaceBuilder` around)
 - rust-lang#122880 (Unix: Support more platforms with `preadv` and `pwritev`)
 - rust-lang#123038 (std library thread.rs: fix NetBSD code for ILP32 CPUs.)
 - rust-lang#123084 (`UnixStream`: override `read_buf`)
 - rust-lang#123102 (RustWrapper: update call for llvm/llvm-project@44d037cc258dcf179d2c48…)
 - rust-lang#123107 (Implement `Vec::pop_if`)
 - rust-lang#123118 (Update `RwLock` deadlock example to not use shadowing)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a2122dc into rust-lang:master Mar 27, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Mar 27, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122439 - Nadrieril:store-built-place, r=compiler-errors

match lowering: build the `Place` instead of keeping a `PlaceBuilder` around

Outside of `MatchPair::new` we don't construct new places, so we don't need to keep a `PlaceBuilder` around.

A bit annoyingly we have to store an `Option<Place>` even though it's never `None` after simplification, but the alternative would be to re-entangle `MatchPair` construction and simplification and I'd rather not do that.
@Nadrieril Nadrieril deleted the store-built-place branch March 27, 2024 09:19
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants