Skip to content

Improve cfg and check-cfg configuration #123519

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

Urgau
Copy link
Member

@Urgau Urgau commented Apr 5, 2024

This PR improves cfg and check-cfg configuration by:

  1. Extracting both logic under a common module (to improve the connection between the two)
  2. Adding more documentation, in particular some steps when adding a new cfg

I also added my-self as mention in our triagebot conf for the new module.

Inspired by #123411 (comment)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 5, 2024

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 5, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 5, 2024

triagebot.toml has been modified, there may have been changes to the review queue.

cc @davidtwco, @wesleywiser

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Makes sense to me!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 5, 2024

📌 Commit c39c0e1 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 5, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123294 (Require LLVM_CONFIG to be set in rustc_llvm/build.rs)
 - rust-lang#123467 (MSVC targets should use COFF as their archive format)
 - rust-lang#123498 (explaining `DefKind::Field`)
 - rust-lang#123519 (Improve cfg and check-cfg configuration)
 - rust-lang#123525 (CFI: Don't rewrite ty::Dynamic directly)
 - rust-lang#123526 (Do not ICE when calling incorrectly defined `transmute` intrinsic)
 - rust-lang#123528 (Hide async_gen_internals from standard library documentation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5b8b236 into rust-lang:master Apr 6, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 6, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123519 - Urgau:session-cfg-check-cfg-improvements, r=wesleywiser

Improve cfg and check-cfg configuration

This PR improves cfg and check-cfg configuration by:
 1. Extracting both logic under a common module (to improve the connection between the two)
 2. Adding more documentation, in particular some steps when adding a new cfg

I also added my-self as mention in our triagebot conf for the new module.

Inspired by rust-lang#123411 (comment)
@Urgau Urgau deleted the session-cfg-check-cfg-improvements branch April 6, 2024 10:45
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants