Skip to content

Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes #123782

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Apr 11, 2024

fixes #122876

This PR used to add extra logic to prevent those cases, but after #113169 this is implicitly rejected, because such usages are not defining.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 11, 2024

r? @TaKO8Ki

rustbot has assigned @TaKO8Ki.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 11, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Apr 16, 2024

r? @aliemjay

@rustbot rustbot assigned aliemjay and unassigned TaKO8Ki Apr 16, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 13, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #124914) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@oli-obk oli-obk changed the title Ensure opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes Jun 18, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jun 18, 2024

r? types

@rustbot rustbot added the T-types Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 18, 2024
@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned aliemjay Jun 18, 2024
//! Test that we don't allow coercing an opaque type with a static
//! lifetime to a free version of itself. While this kind of
//! conversion is fine for rigid types, the hidden type behind an opaque
//! type may
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this comment is incomplete? 🤔

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

pls fix test comment then r=me

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@rustbot author

(so it is out of my review queue hehe)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 18, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jun 18, 2024

@bors r=compiler-errors rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 18, 2024

📌 Commit de473a5 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 18, 2024
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
…r-errors

Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes

fixes rust-lang#122876

This PR used to add extra logic to prevent those cases, but after rust-lang#113169 this is implicitly rejected, because such usages are not defining.
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
…r-errors

Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes

fixes rust-lang#122876

This PR used to add extra logic to prevent those cases, but after rust-lang#113169 this is implicitly rejected, because such usages are not defining.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123782 (Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes)
 - rust-lang#124580 (Suggest removing unused tuple fields if they are the last fields)
 - rust-lang#125852 (improve tip for inaccessible traits)
 - rust-lang#126422 (Suggest using a standalone doctest for non-local impl defs)
 - rust-lang#126427 (Rewrite `intrinsic-unreachable`, `sepcomp-cci-copies`, `sepcomp-inlining` and `sepcomp-separate` `run-make` tests to rmake.rs)
 - rust-lang#126493 (safe transmute: support non-ZST, variantful, uninhabited enums)
 - rust-lang#126572 (override user defined channel when using precompiled rustc)
 - rust-lang#126615 (Add `rustc-ice*` to `.gitignore`)
 - rust-lang#126632 (Replace `move||` with `move ||`)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#126558 (hir_typeck: be more conservative in making "note caller chooses ty param" note)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
…r-errors

Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes

fixes rust-lang#122876

This PR used to add extra logic to prevent those cases, but after rust-lang#113169 this is implicitly rejected, because such usages are not defining.
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
…r-errors

Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes

fixes rust-lang#122876

This PR used to add extra logic to prevent those cases, but after rust-lang#113169 this is implicitly rejected, because such usages are not defining.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123782 (Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes)
 - rust-lang#124580 (Suggest removing unused tuple fields if they are the last fields)
 - rust-lang#125787 (Migrate `bin-emit-no-symbols` `run-make` test to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#126553 (match lowering: expand or-candidates mixed with candidates above)
 - rust-lang#126594 (Make async drop code more consistent with regular drop code)
 - rust-lang#126654 (Make pretty printing for `f16` and `f128` consistent)
 - rust-lang#126656 (rustc_type_ir: Omit some struct fields from Debug output)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f03bd96 into rust-lang:master Jun 19, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 19, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123782 - oli-obk:equal_tait_args, r=compiler-errors

Test that opaque types can't have themselves as a hidden type with incompatible lifetimes

fixes rust-lang#122876

This PR used to add extra logic to prevent those cases, but after rust-lang#113169 this is implicitly rejected, because such usages are not defining.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-types Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TAITs with different args incorrectly assumed to be equal
6 participants