Skip to content

Add a warning to proc_macro::Delimiter::None that rustc currently does not respect it. #124389

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

CensoredUsername
Copy link
Contributor

It does not provide the behaviour it is indicated to provide when used in a proc_macro context.

This seems to be a bug, (#67062), but it is a long standing one, and hard to discover.

This pull request adds a warning to inform users of this issue, with a link to the relevant issue, and a version number of the last known affected rustc version.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 26, 2024

r? @petrochenkov

rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 26, 2024
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 10, 2024
…t it.

It does not provide the behaviour it is indicated to provide when used in
a proc_macro context.
@CensoredUsername
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have updated the commit with the given suggestions.

@CensoredUsername
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 23, 2024
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2024

📌 Commit c2d2df1 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 23, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122382 (Detect unused structs which implement private traits)
 - rust-lang#124389 (Add a warning to proc_macro::Delimiter::None that rustc currently does not respect it.)
 - rust-lang#125224 (Migrate `run-make/issue-53964` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125227 (Migrate `run-make/issue-30063` to `rmake`)
 - rust-lang#125336 (Add dedicated definition for intrinsics)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125454 (Improve the doc of query associated_item)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f862f6d into rust-lang:master May 23, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 23, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124389 - CensoredUsername:master, r=petrochenkov

Add a warning to proc_macro::Delimiter::None that rustc currently does not respect it.

It does not provide the behaviour it is indicated to provide when used in a proc_macro context.

This seems to be a bug, (rust-lang#67062), but it is a long standing one, and hard to discover.

This pull request adds a warning to inform users of this issue, with a link to the relevant issue, and a version number of the last known affected rustc version.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants