Skip to content

coverage: Avoid hard-coded values when visiting logical ops #124508

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

This is a tiny little thing that I noticed during the final review of #123409, and I didn't want to hold up the whole PR just for this.

Instead of separately hard-coding the operation being visited, we can get it from the match arm pattern by using an as-pattern.

@rustbot label +A-code-coverage

Instead of separately hard-coding the operation being visited, we can get it
from the match arm pattern by using an as-pattern.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 29, 2024

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 29, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 29, 2024

Some changes occurred in match lowering

cc @Nadrieril

@rustbot rustbot added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label Apr 29, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 29, 2024

📌 Commit a25a11a has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 29, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124269 (Pretty-print parenthesis around binary in postfix match)
 - rust-lang#124415 (Use probes more aggressively in new solver)
 - rust-lang#124475 (Remove direct dependencies on lazy_static, once_cell and byteorder)
 - rust-lang#124484 (Fix rust-lang#124478 - offset_of! returns a temporary)
 - rust-lang#124504 (Mark unions non-const-propagatable in `KnownPanicsLint` without calling layout)
 - rust-lang#124508 (coverage: Avoid hard-coded values when visiting logical ops)
 - rust-lang#124522 ([Refactor] Rename `Lint` and `LintGroup`'s `is_loaded` to `is_externally_loaded` )

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0797adb into rust-lang:master Apr 29, 2024
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Apr 29, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124508 - Zalathar:op, r=jieyouxu

coverage: Avoid hard-coded values when visiting logical ops

This is a tiny little thing that I noticed during the final review of rust-lang#123409, and I didn't want to hold up the whole PR just for this.

Instead of separately hard-coding the operation being visited, we can get it from the match arm pattern by using an as-pattern.

`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the op branch April 30, 2024 01:13
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants