Skip to content

Use tcx.types.unit instead of Ty::new_unit(tcx) #124624

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

I don't think there is any need for the function, given that we can just access the .types, similarly to all other primitives?

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 2, 2024

r? @TaKO8Ki

rustbot has assigned @TaKO8Ki.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 2, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 2, 2024

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

HIR ty lowering was modified

cc @fmease

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 from me personally, so r=me unless you'd like to give others the chance to chime in, too

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r=fmease

@compiler-errors compiler-errors assigned fmease and unassigned TaKO8Ki May 2, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 2, 2024

📌 Commit 1c9a61d has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 2, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124138 (Ignore LLVM ABI in dlltool tests since those targets don't use dlltool)
 - rust-lang#124414 (remove extraneous note on `UnableToRunDsymutil` diagnostic)
 - rust-lang#124579 (Align: add bytes_usize and bits_usize)
 - rust-lang#124622 (Cleanup: Rid the `rmake` test runners of `extern crate run_make_support;`)
 - rust-lang#124623 (shallow resolve in orphan check)
 - rust-lang#124624 (Use `tcx.types.unit` instead of `Ty::new_unit(tcx)`)
 - rust-lang#124627 (interpret: hide some reexports in rustdoc)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d6940fb into rust-lang:master May 2, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 2, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124624 - WaffleLapkin:old_unit, r=fmease

Use `tcx.types.unit` instead of `Ty::new_unit(tcx)`

I don't think there is any need for the function, given that we can just access the `.types`, similarly to all other primitives?
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the old_unit branch May 2, 2024 21:55
GuillaumeGomez pushed a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Use `tcx.types.unit` instead of `Ty::new_unit(tcx)`

I don't think there is any need for the function, given that we can just access the `.types`, similarly to all other primitives?
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants