Skip to content

const_eval_select: add tracking issue #124626

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented May 2, 2024

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 2, 2024

r? @joboet

rustbot has assigned @joboet.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 2, 2024
@RalfJung RalfJung force-pushed the const_eval_select branch from 3d727d2 to dbe2f51 Compare May 2, 2024 16:39
@@ -2578,8 +2578,7 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" {
///
/// Currently such an assertion would always succeed; until Rust decides
/// otherwise, that principle should not be violated.
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_eval_select", issue = "none")]
#[unstable(feature = "core_intrinsics", issue = "none")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't we need the non-const stability too?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything in this module is implicitly unstable under core_intrinsics, I think. Most of the other intrinsics here do not have that attribute either, no idea what it is present for some of them.

@joboet
Copy link
Member

joboet commented May 2, 2024

LGTM, r=me once CI is green

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r=joboet

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 3, 2024

📌 Commit dbe2f51 has been approved by joboet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 3, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123480 (deref patterns: impl `DerefPure` for more std types)
 - rust-lang#124412 (io safety: update Unix explanation to use `Arc`)
 - rust-lang#124441 (String.truncate comment microfix (greater or equal))
 - rust-lang#124594 (run-make-support: preserve tooks.mk behavior for EXTRACXXFLAGS)
 - rust-lang#124604 (library/std: Remove unused `gimli-symbolize` feature)
 - rust-lang#124607 (`rustc_expand` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#124609 (variable-precision float operations can differ depending on optimization levels)
 - rust-lang#124610 (Tweak `consts_may_unify`)
 - rust-lang#124626 (const_eval_select: add tracking issue)
 - rust-lang#124637 (AST pretty: Use `builtin_syntax` for type ascription)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#124638 (Move some tests from `rustc_expand` to `rustc_parse`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e2a5344 into rust-lang:master May 3, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 3, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124626 - RalfJung:const_eval_select, r=joboet

const_eval_select: add tracking issue
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the const_eval_select branch May 3, 2024 13:29
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

RalfJung commented May 3, 2024

@bors rollup

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

RalfJung commented May 3, 2024

Uh, somehow this is still in the bors queue...
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 3, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants