Skip to content

rustc_lint cleanups #125057

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

rustc_lint cleanups #125057

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

Minor improvements I found while looking through this code.

r? @cjgillot

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 13, 2024
@cjgillot cjgillot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 19, 2024
@nnethercote nnethercote force-pushed the rustc_lint-cleanups branch from 4e48cf6 to bddbaa6 Compare May 20, 2024 05:41
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 21, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #124097) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@nnethercote nnethercote force-pushed the rustc_lint-cleanups branch from bddbaa6 to deda6d9 Compare May 21, 2024 22:15
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 24, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #125434) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased and added the check_gated_lint to the other case. The first commit also disappeared because I ended up doing that extern crate tracing; removal in #125434. Should be ready to merge.

@nnethercote nnethercote force-pushed the rustc_lint-cleanups branch from deda6d9 to f279d3e Compare May 27, 2024 04:02
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

cjgillot commented Jun 1, 2024

Thanks!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 1, 2024

📌 Commit f279d3e has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 1, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2024
…=cjgillot

`rustc_lint` cleanups

Minor improvements I found while looking through this code.

r? `@cjgillot`
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors r-
just needs reformatting I guess
#125857 (comment)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 1, 2024
Wrap overly long ones, etc.
It has a clumsy type, with repeated `&'a [LintId]`, and sometimes
requires an empty string that isn't used in the `Err`+`None` case.

This commit splits it into two variants.
@nnethercote nnethercote force-pushed the rustc_lint-cleanups branch from f279d3e to 32c8a12 Compare June 2, 2024 23:33
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

nnethercote commented Jun 2, 2024

I fixed the formatting.

@bors r=cjgillot

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 2, 2024

📌 Commit 32c8a12 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 2, 2024
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 32c8a12 with merge 9f2d0b3...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing 9f2d0b3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 3, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 9f2d0b3 into rust-lang:master Jun 3, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Jun 3, 2024
@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the rustc_lint-cleanups branch June 3, 2024 03:16
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (9f2d0b3): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.6% [2.6%, 2.6%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.6% [2.6%, 2.6%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.3%, 2.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 667.336s -> 667.872s (0.08%)
Artifact size: 318.97 MiB -> 318.92 MiB (-0.02%)

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants