Rollup of 7 pull requests #125536
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #125536
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
They are no longer supported by LLVM 19. Fixes rust-lang#125492
…jubilee use posix_memalign on almost all Unix targets Seems nice to be able to use a single common codepath for all of them. :) The `libc` crate says this symbol exists for all Unix targets. I did locally do check-builds to ensure this still builds, but I can't really test more than that. - For redox, I found indications posix_memalign really exists [here](https://gitlab.redox-os.org/redox-os/relibc/-/merge_requests/271) - For esp-idf, I found indications [here](playable-tech/esp-idf@c5b297a) - ~~For horizon and vita (these seem to be gaming console OSes? "Horizon OS" also has some hits for a Facebook product but that seems unrelated), they seem to be based on "newlib", where posix_memalign [seems to exist](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commitdiff;h=3ba2c39fb2a12cd7332ef16b1b3e3df994f7c6f5).~~ Turns out no, this 20-year-old standard POSIX function is unfortunately [not supported](rust-lang#125271 (comment)) here.
A small diagnostic improvement for dropping_copy_types For a value `m` which implements `Copy` trait, `drop(m);` does nothing. We now suggest user to ignore it by a abstract and general note: `let _ = ...`. I think we can give a clearer note here: `let _ = m;` fixes rust-lang#125189 <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> -->
Stop using the avx512er and avx512pf x86 target features They are no longer supported by LLVM 19. Fixes rust-lang#125492
…low, r=compiler-errors remove proof tree formatting, make em shallow Debugging via tracing `RUSTC_LOG=rustc_trait_selection::solve=debug` is now imo slightly more readable then the actual proof tree formatter. Removing everything that's not needed for the `analyse` visitor allows us to remove a bunch of code. I personally believe that we should continue to use tracing over proof trees for debugging: - it eagerly prints, allowing us to debug ICEs - the proof tree builder ends up going out of sync with the actual runtime behavior, which is confusing - using shallow proof trees is a lot more performant as we frequently do not recurse into all nested goals when using an analyse visitor - this allows us to clean up the implementation and remove some code r? ``@compiler-errors``
…=jackh726 Don't eagerly monomorphize drop for types that are impossible to instantiate Self-explanatory title I think Fixes rust-lang#125509
Structurally resolve before `builtin_index` in EUV r? lcnr
…ubilee Add manual Sync impl for ReentrantLockGuard Fixes: rust-lang#125526 Tracking Issue: rust-lang#121440 this impl is even shown in the summary in the tracking issue, but apparently was forgotten in the actual implementation
rustbot
added
O-unix
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#125271 (use posix_memalign on almost all Unix targets) - rust-lang#125433 (A small diagnostic improvement for dropping_copy_types) - rust-lang#125498 (Stop using the avx512er and avx512pf x86 target features) - rust-lang#125510 (remove proof tree formatting, make em shallow) - rust-lang#125513 (Don't eagerly monomorphize drop for types that are impossible to instantiate) - rust-lang#125514 (Structurally resolve before `builtin_index` in EUV) - rust-lang#125527 (Add manual Sync impl for ReentrantLockGuard) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
builtin_indexin EUV #125514 (Structurally resolve beforebuiltin_indexin EUV)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup