Skip to content

Rename deprecated_safe lint to deprecated_safe_2024 #125990

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

tbu-
Copy link
Contributor

@tbu- tbu- commented Jun 4, 2024

Create a lint group deprecated_safe that includes deprecated_safe_2024.

Addresses #124866 (comment).

r? @ehuss

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 4, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 6, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #126056) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Jun 18, 2024

@tbu- Just checking if you will be able to fix the CI error? It should have instructions on what to update.

@tbu-
Copy link
Contributor Author

tbu- commented Jun 18, 2024

Haven't updated it yet. But I should be able to do it.

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 18, 2024
Create a lint group `deprecated_safe` that includes
`deprecated_safe_2024`.

Addresses rust-lang#124866 (comment).
@tbu- tbu- force-pushed the pr_unsafe_env_lint_name branch from 2328622 to bf96c56 Compare July 17, 2024 12:40
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Jul 22, 2024

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 22, 2024

📌 Commit bf96c56 has been approved by ehuss

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 22, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117932 (Correct rustdoc section where we talk about rustdoc emitting errors on invalid code)
 - rust-lang#125990 (Rename `deprecated_safe` lint to `deprecated_safe_2024`)
 - rust-lang#127506 (rustc_target: add known safe s390x target features)
 - rust-lang#127820 (Rewrite and rename `issue-14698`. `issue-33329` and `issue-107094` `run-make` tests to rmake or ui)
 - rust-lang#127923 (Use reuse tool 4.0)
 - rust-lang#128008 (Start using `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` in the standard library)
 - rust-lang#128036 (add more tests)
 - rust-lang#128051 (rustdoc: revert spacing change in item-table)
 - rust-lang#128059 (Add regression test for items list size (rust-lang#128023))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 81135a0 into rust-lang:master Jul 22, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 22, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125990 - tbu-:pr_unsafe_env_lint_name, r=ehuss

Rename `deprecated_safe` lint to `deprecated_safe_2024`

Create a lint group `deprecated_safe` that includes `deprecated_safe_2024`.

Addresses rust-lang#124866 (comment).

r? `@ehuss`
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants