Skip to content

Revert "Use the HIR instead of mir_keys for determining whether something will have a MIR body." #126077

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Jun 6, 2024

This reverts commit e5cba17.

turns out SMIR still needs it (model-checking/kani#3218). I'll create a full plan and MCP for what I intended this to be a part of. Maybe my plan is nonsense anyway.

…hing will have a MIR body."

This reverts commit e5cba17.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2024

r? @BoxyUwU

rustbot has assigned @BoxyUwU.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 6, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2024

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

BoxyUwU commented Jun 6, 2024

Do you want to add a SMIR test in this PR?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jun 6, 2024

I should, but I had like 5 mins which wasn't enough to run any tests. Maybe tomorrow

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ fn test_stable_mir() -> ControlFlow<()> {
// Get all items and split generic vs monomorphic items.
let (generic, mono): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) =
items.into_iter().partition(|item| item.requires_monomorphization());
assert_eq!(mono.len(), 3, "Expected 2 mono functions and one constant");
assert_eq!(mono.len(), 4, "Expected 2 mono functions and one constant");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 mono functions and one constant adds up to 3 items not 4 xd

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jun 7, 2024

@bors r=BoxyUwU

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

📌 Commit 9461852 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 7, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124012 (Stabilize `binary_heap_as_slice`)
 - rust-lang#124214 (Parse unsafe attributes)
 - rust-lang#125572 (Detect pub structs never constructed and unused associated constants)
 - rust-lang#125781 (prefer `compile::stream_cargo` for building tools)
 - rust-lang#126030 (Update `./x fmt` command in library/std/src/sys/pal/windows/c/README.md)
 - rust-lang#126047 (Simplify the rayon calls in the installer)
 - rust-lang#126052 (More `rustc_parse` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#126077 (Revert "Use the HIR instead of mir_keys for determining whether something will have a MIR body.")
 - rust-lang#126089 (Stabilize Option::take_if)
 - rust-lang#126112 (Clean up source root in run-make tests)
 - rust-lang#126119 (Improve docs for using custom paths with `--emit`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2e82d7f into rust-lang:master Jun 7, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Jun 7, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126077 - oli-obk:revert_is_mir_available, r=BoxyUwU

Revert "Use the HIR instead of mir_keys for determining whether something will have a MIR body."

This reverts commit e5cba17.

turns out SMIR still needs it (model-checking/kani#3218). I'll create a full plan and MCP for what I intended this to be a part of. Maybe my plan is nonsense anyway.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants