Skip to content

Add a custom Command wrapper to run-make-support #126121

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 8, 2024

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jun 7, 2024

This should make it easier to make sure that we check process exit codes, and it should also make checking of stdout/stderr less verbose and more explicit in run-make tests. I prefer the run()/run_fail().assert(...) style to something like run_fail_assert_exit_code, because the former is more composable.

Regarding #125747, I'm not sure if we really need a custom trait, I think that we can get far enough with just Deref on the Cc/Clang/Rustc/Rustdoc/... structs. But now that these structs don't even need command_output anymore, I think that they are fine-ish as they are with the macro.

Related issues: #125617, #125747

Fixes: #125617 (because command_output is no longer a public method)

r? @jieyouxu

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Jun 7, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 7, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest

cc @jieyouxu

Some changes occurred in run-make tests.

cc @jieyouxu

The run-make-support library was changed

cc @jieyouxu

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks very nice to me in general! Just a couple of suggestion and nits (non-blocking).

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Jun 7, 2024

Thanks, r=me after CI is green.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kobzol commented Jun 7, 2024

Thanks! Need to wait for #126097 first though.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 7, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #126134) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kobzol commented Jun 8, 2024

@bors r=jieyouxu rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 8, 2024

📌 Commit 0a190e8 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 8, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 8, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 0a190e8 with merge f21554f...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 8, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing f21554f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 8, 2024
@bors bors merged commit f21554f into rust-lang:master Jun 8, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 8, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f21554f): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data
Artifact size: 319.74 MiB -> 319.76 MiB (0.00%)

@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the runmake-cmd-wrapper branch June 9, 2024 06:26
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2024
…youxu

Fix documentation for `impl_common_helpers` in `run-make-support`

Forgot to do this in rust-lang#126121.

`@bors` rollup

r? `@jieyouxu`
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2024
…youxu

Fix documentation for `impl_common_helpers` in `run-make-support`

Forgot to do this in rust-lang#126121.

`@bors` rollup

r? `@jieyouxu`
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126188 - Kobzol:runmake-command-docs, r=jieyouxu

Fix documentation for `impl_common_helpers` in `run-make-support`

Forgot to do this in rust-lang#126121.

`@bors` rollup

r? `@jieyouxu`
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Audit usage of command_output methods in rmake.rs tests
6 participants