Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Fix incorrect suggestion for extra argument with a type error #127253

Merged

Conversation

chenyukang
Copy link
Member

@chenyukang chenyukang commented Jul 2, 2024

Fixes #126246

I tried to fix it in the find_errors of ArgMatrix, but seems it's hard to avoid breaking some other test cases.

The root cause is we eliminate the first argument even with a type error at here:

return compatibility_diagonal[provided_idx].clone();

So the left argument is always treated as extra one.

But if there is already a type error, an error message will be generated firstly, which make this issue a trivial one.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 2, 2024

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 2, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Jul 3, 2024

r? @estebank (since you're likely more familiar with this argument mismatch suggestion)

@rustbot rustbot assigned estebank and unassigned jieyouxu Jul 3, 2024
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

estebank commented Jul 3, 2024

I see, you're only handling the "one additional argument that doesn't exist is passed in" case. That's certainly an improvement. I think that we might be able to expand the initial condition to handle multiple, but tbqh, it's fine. Handling the most common case is worth it.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 3, 2024

📌 Commit 9f32459 has been approved by estebank

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 3, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127092 (Change return-type-notation to use `(..)`)
 - rust-lang#127184 (More refactorings to rustc_interface)
 - rust-lang#127190 (Update LLVM submodule)
 - rust-lang#127253 (Fix incorrect suggestion for extra argument with a type error)
 - rust-lang#127280 (Disable rmake test rustdoc-io-error on riscv64gc-gnu)
 - rust-lang#127294 (Less magic number for corountine)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6031309 into rust-lang:master Jul 4, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 4, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127253 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-126246-fn-parameters-check, r=estebank

Fix incorrect suggestion for extra argument with a type error

Fixes rust-lang#126246

I tried to fix it in the `find_errors` of ArgMatrix, but seems it's hard to avoid breaking some other test cases.

The root cause is we eliminate the first argument even with a type error at here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6292b2af620dbd771ebb687c3a93c69ba8f97268/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs#L664

So the left argument is always treated as extra one.

But if there is already a type error, an error message will be generated firstly, which make this issue a trivial one.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Arity errors suggest incorrect fix when there are name errors
5 participants