Skip to content

Rollup of 5 pull requests #127414

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #127414

merged 14 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Oneirical and others added 14 commits July 5, 2024 10:19
This includes a `From<legacy::RangeInclusive> for RangeInclusive` impl for convenience, instead of the `TryFrom` impl from the RFC.
Having `From` is highly convenient and the assertion is unlikely to be a problem in practice.

This includes re-exports of all existing `Range` types under `core::range`, plus the range-related traits (`RangeBounds`, `Step`, `OneSidedRange`) and the `Bound` enum.

Currently the iterators are just wrappers around the old range types,
and most other trait impls delegate to the old rage types as well.

Also includes an `.iter()` shorthand for `.clone().into_iter()`
Add `new_range_api` for RFC 3550

Initial implementation for rust-lang#125687

This includes a `From<legacy::RangeInclusive> for RangeInclusive` impl for convenience, instead of the `TryFrom` impl from the RFC. Having `From` is highly convenient and the debug assert should find almost all misuses.

This includes re-exports of all existing `Range` types under `core::range`, plus the range-related traits (`RangeBounds`, `Step`, `OneSidedRange`) and the `Bound` enum.

Currently the iterators are just wrappers around the old range types.

Tracking issues:

- rust-lang#123741
- rust-lang#125687
…,jieyouxu

Migrate `output-type-permutations` `run-make` test to rmake

Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).

try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: test-various
…021, r=Nadrieril

Match ergonomics 2024: align with RFC again

- `&` matches `&mut` on old editions
- Add some more tests

r? ``@Nadrieril``

cc rust-lang#123076

``@rustbot`` label A-edition-2024 A-patterns
…rrors

Use verbose style for argument removal suggestion
Use verbose suggestion for changing arg type
@rustbot rustbot added A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 6, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 6, 2024

📌 Commit 8531487 has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 6, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 6, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8531487 with merge 28cc0b6...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 6, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: workingjubilee
Pushing 28cc0b6 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 6, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 28cc0b6 into rust-lang:master Jul 6, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 6, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#125751 Add new_range_api for RFC 3550 b87f1bd560d8645d449af8fba92c5e602ee2506f (link)
#127098 Migrate output-type-permutations run-make test to rmake 606f14f061e6cb38c35406c3a3f30c4820caa668 (link)
#127369 Match ergonomics 2024: align with RFC again 7d3c748c631dba39888b21dd370902457cc02226 (link)
#127383 Use verbose style for argument removal suggestion 92bf1b343bca46df9f514bee74377b4f0cb8fa9c (link)
#127392 Use verbose suggestion for changing arg type cb417050037744cf4a062ab7ced5f749511768bc (link)

previous master: 51917e2e69

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (28cc0b6): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.8% [0.5%, 1.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.2%, secondary 0.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.2% [-0.4%, 0.8%] 2

Cycles

Results (primary 2.2%, secondary -2.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.7% [0.5%, 2.2%] 7
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.3% [-6.3%, -0.7%] 13
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.0% [0.0%, 0.0%] 8
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.0% [0.0%, 0.0%] 8

Bootstrap: 697.532s -> 697.348s (-0.03%)
Artifact size: 328.20 MiB -> 328.28 MiB (0.02%)

@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the rollup-lcxw1eh branch July 7, 2024 01:22
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants