Skip to content

Rollup of 6 pull requests #127550

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Sky9x and others added 15 commits July 4, 2024 23:55
This is adding a migration lint for the current (in the 2021 edition and previous)
to move expr to expr_2021 from expr

Co-Developed-by: Eric Holk
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Co-Developed-by: Eric Holk
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
…xpr2024, r=compiler-errors,eholk

migration lint for `expr2024` for the edition 2024

This is adding a migration lint for the current (in the 2021 edition and previous)
to move expr to expr_2021 from expr

Issue rust-lang#123742

I created also a repository to test out the migration https://github.com/vincenzopalazzo/expr2024-cargo-fix-migration

Co-Developed-by: ```@eholk```
…dtolnay

impl FusedIterator and a size hint for the error sources iter

cc tracking issue rust-lang#58520
…e-doc, r=fmease

`#[doc(alias)]`'s doc: say that ASCII spaces are allowed

PR rust-lang#77570 allowed ASCII spaces in doc aliases, but the documentation wasn't updated to say so.

The code checking the aliases:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/7fdefb804ec300fb605039522a7c0dfc9e7dc366/compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs#L693-L704

```````@rustbot``````` label +A-docs
…-errors

small search graph refactor

small improvements which shouldn't impact behavior.

r? ```````@compiler-errors```````
…-pings, r=lqd

Remove spastorino from SMIR

r? ````@oli-obk````
documentation: update cmake version

Previously discussed here: rust-lang#127531
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 10, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 10, 2024

📌 Commit c3f94f3 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 10, 2024
@jhpratt
Copy link
Member

jhpratt commented Jul 10, 2024

This will be wholly subsumed by #127549, which was opened just a hair before this one (and is currently being tested). I don't know how bors reacts in the fact of duplicate commits. I'm closing for that reason. If it handles it nicely (i.e. trying if and only if #127549 fails), then reopen and let me know that that's what happens.

@jhpratt jhpratt closed this Jul 10, 2024
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-p777d1t branch September 1, 2024 17:35
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants