-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
using correct tool mode for run-make-support
crate
#127677
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
It seems like |
We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build. Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Right, that's true. Thanks! |
08f9994
to
fc0d1dc
Compare
compiletest
and run-make-support
cratesrun-make-support
crate
@bors r+ rollup |
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
@bors r- I added explanation comment for compiletest's std usage. |
@rustbot ready |
@bors r+ |
…bzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
…bzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
…kingjubilee Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122300 (Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/dest-prop tests) - rust-lang#126967 (Promote the `wasm32-wasip2` target to Tier 2) - rust-lang#127370 (Windows: Add experimental support for linking std-required system DLLs using raw-dylib) - rust-lang#127434 (use "bootstrap" instead of "rustbuild" in comments and docs) - rust-lang#127477 (Clear `inner_attr_ranges` regularly.) - rust-lang#127558 (More attribute cleanups) - rust-lang#127659 (Use ManuallyDrop in BufWriter::into_parts) - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…bzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
There was a failure in #127696 (comment) but it's not clear which PR failed it. Marking all target-specific and CI-related PRs from that rollup as iffy for now. @bors rollup=iffy |
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122300 (Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/dest-prop tests) - rust-lang#127153 (Initial implementation of anonymous_pipe API) - rust-lang#127434 (use "bootstrap" instead of "rustbuild" in comments and docs) - rust-lang#127477 (Clear `inner_attr_ranges` regularly.) - rust-lang#127659 (Use ManuallyDrop in BufWriter::into_parts) - rust-lang#127671 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 8)) - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…kingjubilee Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127370 (Windows: Add experimental support for linking std-required system DLLs using raw-dylib) - rust-lang#127446 (Remove memory leaks in doctests in `core`, `alloc`, and `std`) - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127677 - onur-ozkan:use-correct-modes, r=Kobzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up
x test run-make-support
invocations on a clean build.