Skip to content

using correct tool mode for run-make-support crate #127677

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 14, 2024

Conversation

onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member

@onur-ozkan onur-ozkan commented Jul 13, 2024

We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up x test run-make-support invocations on a clean build.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 13, 2024

r? @Kobzol

rustbot has assigned @Kobzol.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Jul 13, 2024
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jul 13, 2024

It seems like compiletest uses some internal features of libtest, and it could perhaps cause issues when libtest is changed? 🤔 #79001 (comment)

We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's
unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up
`x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member Author

It seems like compiletest uses some internal features of libtest, and it could perhaps cause issues when libtest is changed? 🤔 #79001 (comment)

Right, that's true. Thanks!

@onur-ozkan onur-ozkan changed the title using correct tool mode for compiletest and run-make-support crates using correct tool mode for run-make-support crate Jul 13, 2024
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jul 13, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 13, 2024

📌 Commit fc0d1dc has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 13, 2024
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r-

I added explanation comment for compiletest's std usage.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 13, 2024
@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 13, 2024
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jul 13, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 13, 2024

📌 Commit 41070bd has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 13, 2024
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
…bzol

using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate

We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
…bzol

using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate

We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122300 (Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/dest-prop tests)
 - rust-lang#126967 (Promote the `wasm32-wasip2` target to Tier 2)
 - rust-lang#127370 (Windows: Add experimental support for linking std-required system DLLs using raw-dylib)
 - rust-lang#127434 (use "bootstrap" instead of "rustbuild" in comments and docs)
 - rust-lang#127477 (Clear `inner_attr_ranges` regularly.)
 - rust-lang#127558 (More attribute cleanups)
 - rust-lang#127659 (Use ManuallyDrop in BufWriter::into_parts)
 - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
…bzol

using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate

We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

There was a failure in #127696 (comment) but it's not clear which PR failed it. Marking all target-specific and CI-related PRs from that rollup as iffy for now.

@bors rollup=iffy

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122300 (Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/dest-prop tests)
 - rust-lang#127153 (Initial implementation of anonymous_pipe API)
 - rust-lang#127434 (use "bootstrap" instead of "rustbuild" in comments and docs)
 - rust-lang#127477 (Clear `inner_attr_ranges` regularly.)
 - rust-lang#127659 (Use ManuallyDrop in BufWriter::into_parts)
 - rust-lang#127671 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 8))
 - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127370 (Windows: Add experimental support for linking std-required system DLLs using raw-dylib)
 - rust-lang#127446 (Remove memory leaks in doctests in `core`, `alloc`, and `std`)
 - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9201f18 into rust-lang:master Jul 14, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127677 - onur-ozkan:use-correct-modes, r=Kobzol

using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate

We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 14, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants