Skip to content

Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory #128038

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Jul 21, 2024

Currently tests can ICE when the test spits out inc-fat incremental artifacts directly into the top of the git checkout, and then the compiler version changes, and it reads nonsense incremental artifacts on a subsequent test run.

r? @oli-obk

cc @Oneirical, I think you added this -- I think the right flag to add when porting -Cincremental run-make tests is to use //@ incremental rather than manually specifying the -Cincremental rustflag.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 21, 2024

Could not assign reviewer from: oli-obk.
User(s) oli-obk are either the PR author, already assigned, or on vacation, and there are no other candidates.
Use r? to specify someone else to assign.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 21, 2024

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 21, 2024
@compiler-errors compiler-errors changed the title Don't output test artifacts into working directory Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory Jul 21, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 21, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 21, 2024

📌 Commit 6a9110a has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 21, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127583 (Deal with invalid UTF-8 from `gai_strerror`)
 - rust-lang#128014 (Fix stab display in doc blocks)
 - rust-lang#128020 (Just totally fully deny late-bound consts)
 - rust-lang#128023 (rustdoc: short descriptions cause word-breaks in tables)
 - rust-lang#128033 (Explain why we require `_` for empty patterns)
 - rust-lang#128038 (Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit fdef1d9 into rust-lang:master Jul 22, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128038 - compiler-errors:inc-fat, r=oli-obk

Don't output incremental test artifacts into working directory

Currently tests can ICE when the test spits out `inc-fat` incremental artifacts directly into the top of the git checkout, and then the compiler version changes, and it reads nonsense incremental artifacts on a subsequent test run.

r? `@oli-obk`

cc `@Oneirical,` I think you added this -- I think the right flag to add when porting `-Cincremental` run-make tests is to use `//@ incremental` rather than manually specifying the `-Cincremental` rustflag.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 22, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants