Unify wording of "failed to resolve" errors with "cannot find" resolution errors #128086
+538
−432
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
|
Split off from #126810. "Hide whitespace" will aid in seeing mostly "true" changes. The amount of files being touched is a consequence of the blast radius the diagnostic has. Happy to hear about other potential alternatives for what the output should be instead. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Blocking on the wording discussion in #128080 (comment). |
rustbot
added
S-blocked
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
lolbinarycat
added
the
A-diagnostics
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
estebank
force-pushed
the
failed-to-resolve
branch
from
2abb31d to
b32d0e7
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
estebank
commented
May 27, 2025
estebank
force-pushed
the
failed-to-resolve
branch
from
b32d0e7 to
c397b99
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
estebank
added
S-waiting-on-review
…tion errors * Use the same wording for all macro resolution errors * specify the scope in which the resolution failure happened Before ``` error[E0433]: failed to resolve: `crate` in paths can only be used in start position --> $DIR/crate-path-non-absolute.rs:5:22 | LL | let s = ::m::crate::S; | ^^^^^ `crate` in paths can only be used in start position ``` after ``` error[E0433]: cannot find module `crate` in module `m` --> $DIR/crate-path-non-absolute.rs:5:22 | LL | let s = ::m::crate::S; | ^^^^^ `crate` in paths can only be used in start position ```
estebank
force-pushed
the
failed-to-resolve
branch
from
c397b99 to
fa24625
Compare
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `r#mod` | |||
| error[E0433]: cannot find item `mod` in this scope | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error[E0433]: cannot find item `mod` in this scope | |
| error[E0433]: cannot find item `mod` in the crate root |
r#mod in crate::r#mod is not resolved in the current scope.
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| error[E0433]: failed to resolve: partially resolved path in a macro | |||
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `bar` in this scope | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `bar` in this scope | |
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `bar` in enum `Foo` |
| @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ | |||
| error[E0433]: failed to resolve: partially resolved path in a derive macro | |||
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `Anything` in this scope | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `Anything` in this scope | |
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `Anything` in trait `Foo` |
| | ^^^^^ there are too many leading `super` keywords | ||
| | ^^^^^ can't use `super` as an identifier | ||
| | | ||
| help: if you still want to call your identifier `super`, use the raw identifier format |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Path segment keywords (is_path_segment_keyword) like self or super cannot be raw identifiers.
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| error[E0433]: failed to resolve: partially resolved path in a macro | |||
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `Ok` in this scope | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `Ok` in this scope | |
| error[E0433]: cannot find macro `Ok` in enum `Result` |
| @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ extern crate macro_helpers as _; | |||
| /* lang and libs implicitly in scope */ | |||
|
|
|||
| // tool/extern -> extern | |||
| #[type_ns::inner] //~ ERROR could not find `inner` in `type_ns` | |||
| #[type_ns::inner] //~ ERROR cannot find macro `inner` in crate `macro_helpers` | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| #[type_ns::inner] //~ ERROR cannot find macro `inner` in crate `macro_helpers` | |
| #[type_ns::inner] //~ ERROR cannot find macro `inner` in crate `type_ns` |
would be preferable, although I'm not sure.
| @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ error[E0742]: visibilities can only be restricted to ancestor modules | |||
| LL | pub(in std::vec) struct F; | |||
| | ^^^^^^^^ | |||
|
|
|||
| error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `nonexistent` | |||
| error[E0433]: cannot find item `nonexistent` in this scope | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error[E0433]: cannot find item `nonexistent` in this scope | |
| error[E0433]: cannot find item `nonexistent` in the crate root |
This is 2015 edition, so imports and visibilities are resolved in the root module.
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| error[E0433]: failed to resolve: `String` is a struct, not a module | |||
| error[E0433]: cannot find module `String` in this scope | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error[E0433]: cannot find module `String` in this scope | |
| error[E0433]: cannot find module `String` in module `string` |
| @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ LL - bar: st::cell::Cell<bool> | |||
| LL + bar: cell::Cell<bool> | |||
| | | |||
|
|
|||
| error[E0433]: failed to resolve: function `bar` is not a crate or module | |||
| error[E0433]: cannot find item `bar` in this scope | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can find bar, but it's a function and not a module, the previous error told about that.
| format!( | ||
| "partially resolved path in {} {}", | ||
| kind.article(), | ||
| kind.descr() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This could give a more precise description, like "attribute macro" or "derive macro".
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #142028) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before
after
r? @petrochenkov