Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

trans her gender #128293

Merged
Merged

Conversation

aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 27, 2024
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup p=1 (this is the most important pr ever)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 27, 2024

📌 Commit 16fc1bb has been approved by Noratrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 27, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 16fc1bb with merge 7c20b30...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job i686-mingw failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
---- [run-make] tests\run-make\dump-ice-to-disk stdout ----

error: rmake recipe failed to complete
status: exit code: 101
command: "C:\\a\\rust\\rust\\build\\i686-pc-windows-gnu\\test\\run-make\\dump-ice-to-disk\\rmake.exe"
--- stderr -------------------------------
thread 'main' panicked at C:\a\rust\rust\tests\run-make\dump-ice-to-disk\rmake.rs:55:5:
assertion `left == right` failed
  left: 61

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 28, 2024
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2024

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 28, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 16fc1bb with merge 0bb6fec...

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Jul 28, 2024

Huh that's concerning... how did that test fail 😅
Cannot reproduce failure locally on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu or x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

wtf

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Noratrieb
Pushing 0bb6fec to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 28, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 0bb6fec into rust-lang:master Jul 28, 2024
13 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.82.0 milestone Jul 28, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0bb6fec): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [1.5%, 4.5%] 11
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 769.808s -> 772.73s (0.38%)
Artifact size: 331.62 MiB -> 331.60 MiB (-0.01%)

@aDotInTheVoid aDotInTheVoid deleted the github-pls-fix-🏳️‍⚧️ branch August 13, 2024 19:34
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants