Skip to content

Rollup of 5 pull requests #128508

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 commented Aug 1, 2024

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 23 commits July 30, 2024 12:28
…3, r=petrochenkov"

This reverts commit 91b18a0, reversing
changes made to 9aedec9.
…nce, r=pnkfelix"

This reverts commit a70dc29, reversing
changes made to ceae371.
It has a single use. This makes the `let` handling case in
`parse_stmt_without_recovery` more similar to the statement path and
statement expression cases.
`parse_expr_assoc_with` has an awkward structure -- sometimes the lhs is
already parsed. This commit splits the post-lhs part into a new method
`parse_expr_assoc_rest_with`, which makes everything shorter and
simpler.
…nce-2, r=pnkfelix"

This reverts commit 31fe962, reversing
changes made to f203078.
…nce, r=pnkfelix"

This reverts commit 2724aea, reversing
changes made to d929a42.
…9, r=petrochenkov"

This reverts commit 977c5fd, reversing
changes made to 24c94f0.
…nce, r=pnkfelix"

This reverts commit 13314df, reversing
changes made to 6e534c7.
It can be done more concisely.
When collecting tokens there are two kinds of range:
- a range relative to the parser's full token stream (which we get when
  we are parsing);
- a range relative to a single AST node's token stream (which we use
  within `LazyAttrTokenStreamImpl` when replacing tokens).

These are currently both represented with `Range<u32>` and it's easy to
mix them up -- until now I hadn't properly understood the difference.

This commit introduces `ParserRange` and `NodeRange` to distinguish
them. This also requires splitting `ReplaceRange` in two, giving the new
types `ParserReplacement` and `NodeReplacement`. (These latter two names
reduce the overloading of the word "range".)

The commit also rewrites some comments to be clearer.

The end result is a little more verbose, but much clearer.
This file tests for UB in `reduce_add`, but those are reimplemented by explicitly using the associativity specified by Intel
rustdoc: Remove OpaqueTy

r? `@ghost`

Apparently this works lol?!?

try-job: aarch64-apple
…hanges, r=pnkfelix

Revert recent changes to dead code analysis

This is a revert to recent changes to dead code analysis, namely:
* efdf219 Rollup merge of rust-lang#128104 - mu001999-contrib:fix/128053, r=petrochenkov
* a70dc29 Rollup merge of rust-lang#127017 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance, r=pnkfelix
* 31fe962 Rollup merge of rust-lang#127107 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance-2, r=pnkfelix
* 2724aea Rollup merge of rust-lang#126618 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance, r=pnkfelix
* 977c5fd Rollup merge of rust-lang#126315 - mu001999-contrib:fix/126289, r=petrochenkov
* 13314df Rollup merge of rust-lang#125572 - mu001999-contrib:dead/enhance, r=pnkfelix

There is an additional change stacked on top, which suppresses false-negatives that were masked by this work. I believe the functions that are touched in that code are legitimately unused functions and the types are not reachable since this `AnonPipe` type is not publically reachable -- please correct me if I'm wrong cc `@NobodyXu` who added these in #rust-lang#127153.

Some of these reverts (rust-lang#126315 and rust-lang#126618) are only included because it makes the revert apply cleanly, and I think these changes were only done to fix follow-ups from the other PRs?

I apologize for the size of the PR and the churn that it has on the codebase (and for reverting `@mu001999's` work here), but I'm putting this PR up because I am concerned that we're making ad-hoc changes to fix bugs that are fallout of these PRs, and I'd like to see these changes reimplemented in a way that's more separable from the existing dead code pass. I am happy to review any code to reapply these changes in a more separable way.

cc `@mu001999`
r? `@pnkfelix`

Fixes rust-lang#128272
Fixes rust-lang#126169
Update the stdarch submodule

cc `@tgross35` `@Amanieu`
r? `@tgross35`

try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
…s, r=petrochenkov

Still more `cfg` cleanups

Found while looking closely at `cfg`/`cfg_attr` processing code.

r? `@petrochenkov`
…r-errors

MIR required_consts, mentioned_items: ensure we do not forget to fill these lists

Bodies initially get created with empty required_consts and mentioned_items, but at some point those should be filled. Make sure we notice when that is forgotten.
@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Aug 1, 2024
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgross35 commented Aug 1, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2024

📌 Commit 8844e08 has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 1, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127276 (rustdoc: Remove OpaqueTy)
 - rust-lang#128404 (Revert recent changes to dead code analysis)
 - rust-lang#128466 (Update the stdarch submodule)
 - rust-lang#128483 (Still more `cfg` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#128494 (MIR required_consts, mentioned_items: ensure we do not forget to fill these lists)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8844e08 with merge 14cf1cd...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-17 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args deriving-hygiene.rs`

error: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit status: 0
command: env -u RUSTC_LOG_COLOR RUSTC_ICE="0" RUST_BACKTRACE="short" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc" "/checkout/tests/ui-fulldeps/deriving-hygiene.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "-Zsimulate-remapped-rust-src-base=/rustc/FAKE_PREFIX" "-Ztranslate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/cargo" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/checkout/vendor" "--sysroot" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-sysroot" "--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--check-cfg" "cfg(FALSE)" "-O" "--error-format" "json" "--json" "future-incompat" "-Ccodegen-units=1" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zwrite-long-types-to-disk=no" "-Cstrip=debuginfo" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "-o" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui-fulldeps/deriving-hygiene/a" "-A" "internal_features" "-Crpath" "-Cdebuginfo=0" "-Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui-fulldeps/deriving-hygiene/auxiliary"
--- stderr -------------------------------
warning: struct `Foo` is never constructed
##[warning]  --> /checkout/tests/ui-fulldeps/deriving-hygiene.rs:24:8
   |
---
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args deriving-global.rs`

error: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit status: 0
command: env -u RUSTC_LOG_COLOR RUSTC_ICE="0" RUST_BACKTRACE="short" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc" "/checkout/tests/ui-fulldeps/deriving-global.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "-Zsimulate-remapped-rust-src-base=/rustc/FAKE_PREFIX" "-Ztranslate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/cargo" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/checkout/vendor" "--sysroot" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-sysroot" "--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--check-cfg" "cfg(FALSE)" "-O" "--error-format" "json" "--json" "future-incompat" "-Ccodegen-units=1" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zwrite-long-types-to-disk=no" "-Cstrip=debuginfo" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "-o" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui-fulldeps/deriving-global/a" "-A" "internal_features" "-Crpath" "-Cdebuginfo=0" "-Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui-fulldeps/deriving-global/auxiliary"
--- stderr -------------------------------
warning: enum `A` is never used
##[warning]  --> /checkout/tests/ui-fulldeps/deriving-global.rs:21:10
   |

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 1, 2024
@tgross35 tgross35 closed this Aug 1, 2024
@tgross35 tgross35 deleted the rollup-08r9equ branch August 1, 2024 19:52
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend O-unix Operating system: Unix-like rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants