codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks #130308
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @wesleywiser rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
davidtwco
force-pushed
the
tied-target-consolidation
branch
from
7550062 to
bf9891a
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Enabling a tied feature should not enable the other feature automatically. This was fixed by something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.
`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This commit consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.
davidtwco
force-pushed
the
tied-target-consolidation
branch
from
bf9891a to
207bc77
Compare
wesleywiser
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2024
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
…n, r=wesleywiser codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks Fixes rust-lang#105110. Fixes rust-lang#105111. `rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected. Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
…n, r=wesleywiser codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks Fixes rust-lang#105110. Fixes rust-lang#105111. `rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected. Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
…n, r=wesleywiser codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks Fixes rust-lang#105110. Fixes rust-lang#105111. `rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected. Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#130308 (codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks) - rust-lang#130538 (Stabilize const `{slice,array}::from_mut`) - rust-lang#130741 (rustc_target: Add sme-b16b16 as an explicit aarch64 target feature) - rust-lang#131033 (Precise capturing in traits) - rust-lang#131442 (Match std `RUSTFLAGS` for host and target for `mir-opt` test suite to fix double std build/rebuilds) - rust-lang#131470 (add test infra to explicitely test rustc with autodiff/enzyme disabled) - rust-lang#131475 (Compiler & its UI tests: Rename remaining occurrences of "object safe" to "dyn compatible" ) - rust-lang#131493 (Avoid redundant sysroot additions to `PATH` when linking) - rust-lang#131509 (Update .mailmap) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130308 - davidtwco:tied-target-consolidation, r=wesleywiser codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks Fixes rust-lang#105110. Fixes rust-lang#105111. `rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected. Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.
antoyo
pushed a commit
to antoyo/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
…n, r=wesleywiser codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks Fixes rust-lang#105110. Fixes rust-lang#105111. `rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected. Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in rust-lang#128796, probably rust-lang#128221 or rust-lang#128679.
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #105110.
Fixes #105111.
rustc_codegen_llvmandrustc_codegen_gccduplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks intorustc_codegen_ssain thecodegen_fn_attrsquery, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in #128796, probably #128221 or #128679.