Skip to content

Rollup of 3 pull requests #130444

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 3 pull requests #130444

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 8 commits September 7, 2024 07:38
…r=BoxyUwU

Don't call `fn_arg_names` query for non-`fn` foreign items in resolver

Fixes rust-lang#130015
…oxyUwU

Do not report an excessive number of overflow errors for an ever-growing deref impl

Check that we don't first hit the recursion limit in `get_field_candidates_considering_privacy` before probing for methods when we have a method lookup failure and we want to see if `.field.method()` exists. We also silence overflow error messages if we're probing for methods for diagnostics.

Also renames some functions to make it clearer that they're only for diagnostics, and sprinkle some `Autoderef::silence_errors` around to silence unnecessary overflow errors that come from diagnostics.

Fixes rust-lang#130224.
Avoid crashing on variadic functions when producing arg-mismatch errors

Fixes rust-lang#130372 by accommodating how variadic functions change the argument list length between HIR body and FnDecls.

Also degrades the zip_eq to a debug_assert! to match other asserts in the area to avoid being disruptive to users. There is at least one other crash in this area I am working on in rust-lang#130400 and also considering how we might refactor some of this code to hoist some of this logic up higher.

r? `@compiler-errors`
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 16, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=3

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 16, 2024

📌 Commit 14ee69c has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 16, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 16, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 14ee69c with merge c52c23b...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 16, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing c52c23b to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 16, 2024
@bors bors merged commit c52c23b into rust-lang:master Sep 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 16, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#130033 Don't call fn_arg_names query for non-fn foreign items … b8d0181e05964523097d3827737fea8e3a8c505d (link)
#130282 Do not report an excessive number of overflow errors for an… c4fde577145520936f0ce93ee54225607c39dd61 (link)
#130437 Avoid crashing on variadic functions when producing arg-mis… 500919d7285eda6e00af83b3333a15e939584f4b (link)

previous master: fd2c811d25

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c52c23b): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 5.1%, secondary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
5.1% [5.1%, 5.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 5.1% [5.1%, 5.1%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 759.275s -> 759.714s (0.06%)
Artifact size: 341.29 MiB -> 341.38 MiB (0.03%)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-onlrjva branch January 25, 2025 09:13
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants